Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Gold Fibre Silk Scratches on Epson 3800  (Read 11410 times)

AaronPhotog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
    • Dygart Photography
Gold Fibre Silk Scratches on Epson 3800
« Reply #20 on: March 27, 2009, 11:59:53 PM »

Michael,

I certainly don't claim to be an expert, just a guy who tries things to find some things that will work and a lot that don't.  I think you'll find that the fiber based papers will lose their slight curvature within a short period of time.  My prints usually flatten on their own in a day or two at the most.  I use 20"x30" foamcore board with little strips glued to the top and bottom to lift the next board up the thickness of the foamcore and to keep each one in position side to side.  That leaves enough air gap at the ends so that the prints can breath for as long as I leave them in the stack without picking up a lot of dust.  Always put an empty drying board on top of the stack.  I find that with the 17"x25" Fiber Based papers, I can put the next foamcore board on top almost immediately without the print touching it.  After you take the prints out, you can stack them in a flat place, a used print box, or whatever with good acid-free interleaving paper, such as Westminster paper, between prints.  They will be totally flat for mounting in short order.  I don't think it's a good idea to frame them behind glass or plexiglass before at least a week or two have passed, as you might still get offgassing and have to take them out of the frames again to clean the inside of the glazing.

If your machine is new, the pizza wheels will eventually polish down so that they won't leave marks.  At least that's been my experience.  Try running a sheet of 17" wide fairly stiff stock through the printer upside down repeatedly.  Don't print on it, just advance it through multiple times.  It didn't take very long for me to totally eliminate the little fine pizza wheel marks by doing that.  Maybe a half dozen passes once or twice.  The back of the paper should be calendared smooth, and not something that will leave fibers behind.  A thick glossy paper like your GFS run upside down should do the trick.  Yes, you should use the sheet feed, not the rear feed on large paper.  See my post above for how to use it for best results.

Settings of Wide (not Wider) and 5 work well for me.  Even Auto seems to work OK.

For selecting papers, I subject them all, whether glossy, matte, luster, or whatever, to the same initial test.  I print the calibration file from Quadtone Rip and read the patches on the black, gray, and light gray ramps and then plot the densities as curves in a single Excel graph.  All that calibration file does is push ink in 20 steps from minimum to maximum.  No possibility of screwing up a setting.  It just pushes ink.  That test tells me very quickly how well the paper takes ink.  A lot of highly touted papers block up in a hurry and then lose density!  Some produce bumpy curves while others take ink in very smooth curves and get decent dMax numbers.  Several matte papers can't get a decent black to save their souls.  If you get clean, smooth curves and a good dMax, you can be assured of a relatively easy time of linearizing or profiling for the paper.  Otherwise, all bets are off.  Subjectively, too, you can compare their colors, surfaces, reflective qualities.  You'll immediately spot bronzing and gloss differential problems, and you can tell which papers are loaded with brightners (even if they say they aren't), and which ones are not (not that I think brighteners are all that bad, but that's another story).  For matte papers that I've tested so far, I find one to be outstanding in many respects, and that is Epson's Velvet Fine Art, though I wish they'd go ahead and put out a version with some brightener, or a better bleach job, but it's a very fine paper with few faults.  The dMax is the best of the matte papers I've tested.  I haven't tried Hahnemuhle's William Turner, but some say it's hard to match the depth that you can get from that paper.  For a very white paper, Red River 60# Polar Matte has a fairly decent black, excellent curves, and they even make a nice dual sided version.  If you compare it with VFA, though, the blacks will look weak.  Just don't blast it with light that's too strong, and it will be very impressive.  Yes, it has OBA's.  You have a right to worry about them if you wish.

Good luck and Aloha,
Aaron

Logged
Aaron Dygart,
Honolulu

Conner999

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 587
Gold Fibre Silk Scratches on Epson 3800
« Reply #21 on: March 28, 2009, 08:23:15 AM »

Aaron

You're advice about dulling the pizza wheels looks like a great idea - will try.

Also second the recc for VFA. Tried a couple of sheets when I was in a "what the hell" mood as I don't normally prefer matte paper. Tied all the usual suspects. but found them dull, with weak blacks, lousy saturation. The VA The results blew me away. The texture of the paper vanishes in any area with detail yet gives the image a notable 3D effect. The amount of detail retained is amazing as well. Great color and saturation and DEEP, almost glossy-level blacks. As been my main color paper since. Also does a mean job on B&W - especially higher contrast images (suing Eric Chan's ABW profile).
« Last Edit: March 28, 2009, 08:25:02 AM by Conner999 »
Logged

Mr. Capp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
Gold Fibre Silk Scratches on Epson 3800
« Reply #22 on: March 31, 2009, 11:46:42 AM »

Aaron,
One other question for ya!

When I started using GFS I had white banding due to the platen gap set too wide(I used "wider") SO initially I set the DPI to 2880 and it cleared
everything up. Then I set the platen to "wide" or auto and it's all okay and I can print at 1440 no problem. Today I ran GFS through with your awesome
wet backing solution, no problems. Then I ran some lustre rc paper through and it had the banding in some areas. I ran the nozzle check but it didn't seem to indicate
a cleaning or anything. I upped the DPI to 2880 again on the RC and it had no problems.

So, have you ever had any weird banding issues, either due to platen gap settings, or nozzle stuff. It's a white banding.

Just curious. This 3800 is such a great machine once the settings are properly fine tuned to the paper and curvature of the earth.

-Michael  
Logged

AaronPhotog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
    • Dygart Photography
Gold Fibre Silk Scratches on Epson 3800
« Reply #23 on: March 31, 2009, 12:41:11 PM »

Michael,

No, I haven't had any banding problems at all.  When I got the machine I ran a paper "thickness pattern" and adjusted it.  I don't remember whether I had it set for "standard" thickness or wide, but I haven't used the "wider" setting at all.  The instructions are in page 45 and 46 of the printer manual under "Creating a Paper Configuration."  This configuration adjusts the paper feed to correspond with the thickness setting.  You run a pattern and note which pair of lines is closest without overlapping or leaving a gap, and then select the corresponding number and save the setting.  That's probably all you need to do.  There's also a "Paper Adjust A" and a Paper Adjust B" that can help, particularly the "B."  You set a lower value if you have white banding.  If you don't have the instructions, let me know.  You can also do automatic or manual head alignments (see page 87 - "Aligning the Print Head"), but I don't think that is the problem from what you describe.

Aloha,
Aaron
Logged
Aaron Dygart,
Honolulu
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up