Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Film vs. Digital  (Read 1908 times)

jsch

  • Guest
Film vs. Digital
« on: March 09, 2009, 04:00:47 pm »

Hi,

I wanted to share this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YpO6PypJIQ...feature=related

Rankin re-did Cecil Beaton once with film and once with digital. It's not about sharpness, it's about the look.

This is part 2 of 8 parts. The other parts are also very interesting. Perhaps you know it already.

Best,
Johannes
« Last Edit: March 09, 2009, 04:02:29 pm by jsch »
Logged

Doug Peterson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4210
    • http://www.doug-peterson.com
Film vs. Digital
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2009, 05:20:51 pm »

Quote from: jsch
Hi,

I wanted to share this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YpO6PypJIQ...feature=related

Rankin re-did Cecil Beaton once with film and once with digital. It's not about sharpness, it's about the look.

This is part 2 of 8 parts. The other parts are also very interesting. Perhaps you know it already.

Best,
Johannes

C1 Pro version 3, Mamiya RZ Pro IID with a Mamiya/Phase mount Phase One Digital Back. Not a bad combo.

That said, if you're looking to replicate a period photo you should use period equipment.

I wonder if having a more enigmatic look while shooting film had anything to do with the fact that she had yet to sit in a hot-light cake for hour(s?).

__________________
Doug Peterson (Email Me)
Head of Technical Services
Phase One, Canon, Apple, Profoto, Eizo & More
National: 877.217.9870  |  Cell: 740.707.2183
Newsletter: Read Latest or Sign Up
« Last Edit: March 09, 2009, 05:21:40 pm by dougpetersonci »
Logged

amsp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 810
Film vs. Digital
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2009, 06:13:55 pm »

Thanks for posting, hadn't seen this documentary.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up