I wonder why Michael never give 5dII a proper field review, altought he compare it with other cameras and mentioned its name here and there but never dedicated article. why? because he does not like it that much or he falls in love with Sony900 so much that it overulled 5dII? IMHO, 5dII worh it having more atention and some writing about in details specially with such an affordable price and such a picture quality.Come on Michael!
I think you will find its a case of there being only so many hours in the day - Michael clearly already has substantial commitments, LLVJ, Countless tutorials [in the last year], trips, holidays, workshops, print workshops, gallery, maintaing a website, administrating a website, moderating a forum, visiting PMA, ad infinitum
I think its pretty good how often he turns around articles already - and dont forget, he just got back from Antarctica where he used and is reviewing a D3X, Sony A900, and Phase P65+ systems. Something has to give!
And wasnt Chris using and reviewing the 5D MKII? To wit, he posted an article a week or so ago in relation to same from memory.
I think people forget Michael is not getting paid for a lot of this stuff.