Fun with the Zapruder film, what do you think

[Craig Lamson]

A Physist from OZ says some things are impossible to photograph, such as a change in angle the of a vertical line, what do you think.  Please note this guy has NOT tested his theory by actually shooting photos....

http://www.assassinationscience.com/johnco...intro/sign.html

http://www.assassinationscience.com/johnco...o/lamppost.html

[joergen geerds]

hmm, another conspiracy theorist? they never go away, don't they?

well, I looked at the site, and he is complaining that objects move while he thinks that they shouldn't move.
from my extensive panorama shooting experience, all I can say is that a handheld camera will always produce some sort of parallax error, and the video footage shows just that... no conspiracy at all, just plain old parallax errors due to shaky camera.

[feppe]

Interesting indeed, but there was a nice recent Mythbusters episode where they busted some of the NASA moon landing photography myths quite easily. Haven't taken a close look at the site linked, but I'd imagine it would face a similar fate with some extra scrutiny.

[David Sutton]

Another junk website trying to cover up shoddy thinking with fancy words.
Example: For "The images were corrected for pincushion distortion and perspective effects before being “stitched together” using advanced computer programs."  read "we have a copy of PaintShopPro".
He uses the expression "scientists have proved" with no references. If you google " James H. Fetzer", the man behind these views you will discover that he is barking mad. Don't waste your time. David
Edit: Oops, misread your tone   Comes of reading posts before coffee