Subscribe for $1/month
Login
Videos
Luminous Landscape Home
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
April 19, 2024, 11:57:59 pm
Home
Help
Search
Login (forum only)
Login (Subscriber)
Register
Luminous Landscape Home
Luminous Landscape Forum
>
Raw & Post Processing, Printing
>
Digital Image Processing
>
Photomatix 'strong detection' - any downside?
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Photomatix 'strong detection' - any downside? (Read 1583 times)
jfsavage
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 16
Photomatix 'strong detection' - any downside?
«
on:
January 05, 2009, 02:14:51 pm »
Is there any reason for not always selecting the ghosting reduction option ("Moving objects/people" or "Background movements") as 'high'? Is there any downside to the high detection, or the ghosting reduction in general?
Logged
Guillermo Luijk
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 2005
Photomatix 'strong detection' - any downside?
«
Reply #1 on:
January 05, 2009, 08:05:01 pm »
From my tests anti-ghosting in Photomatix simply forces blending non-progressive, so every single pixel will be taken from a unique source image. This could improve some moving parts of the image but make others worse, like in this image where Photomatix didn't manage to blend properly the 2 images provided and the anti-ghosting activated reinforced the exposure calculation mistakes:
Logged
http://www.guillermoluijk.com
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Luminous Landscape Forum
>
Raw & Post Processing, Printing
>
Digital Image Processing
>
Photomatix 'strong detection' - any downside?
Loading...