Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?  (Read 9685 times)

hassiman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 156
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« on: December 10, 2008, 05:18:14 pm »

Hi,

I am about to get a DSLR... a few years ago the choice would have been easy... Canon owned the territory... but Nikon's D3 and D700 seem to be awsome bodies... but bodies don't an image make... with the Bodies and lenses now available from each maker which is the best choice?

 I am unlikely to have need of long glass and a wide to moderate tele zoom would probably be best for my style of shooting.  Looking at the 5D MII and the Nikon equivilant.. I think the D700.  

I have always thought the Nikon glass felt more sturdy... but Canon L lenses are not too shabby.  

I know that these bodies have superfast autofocus but I would really like a lens that I could quickly focus manually if desired... would the Canon or Nikon be best for this?

Thanks
Logged

Slough

  • Guest
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2008, 05:32:02 pm »

It's a case of six of one and half a dozen of the other. As you say, a few years back the answer was easy. Not now though. In your place I would make a list of what I want now, and what I might need later. Then I would work out which manufacturer offered what I wanted, and at what price. Finally I would check reviews to see if any items are especially good/bad, and I would handle the cameras to see which I liked or disliked. Bear in mind that Zeiss lenses should be available in both brands in a year or two.
Logged

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13983
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2008, 05:41:22 pm »

You cannot go wrong with either, the choice will depend on your priorities:

- 5dii: better low ISO detail and video, a tad more expensive
- D700: slightly better high ISO image quality, better AF and more robust build.

Lenswise, they are close but:

- Canon: better bright primes line up
- Nikon: better wide angle image image quality in zooms

System and strategy wise, it seems that Nikon is now focussing more on the very high end with premium prices, while Canon is trying to address the full width of the market.

Cheers,
Bernard

Kirk Gittings

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1561
    • http://www.KirkGittings.com
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2008, 06:28:23 pm »

What are you shooting? I think it matters to some degree.
Logged
Thanks,
Kirk Gittings

hassiman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 156
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2008, 06:36:25 pm »

Kirk,

I mostly do street / landscape / fine art work.... texture shots etc.  Never long glass.  Like to focus manually sometuimes.  Print both B&W and color.  Have been using Canon G9/G10 RAW for a while now but want the DR and sharpness when I need it.  I musy admit that sometimes the huge P&S DOF is great.  Will not get rid of the G10.

I have the opportunity to start from scratch with a DSLR...  I think that the new Panny G1 is a lead others will follow... No mirror slap... ability to get rid of retrofocus lens designs so the wides will get MUCH better... but until then I need something a bit better than the G10
Logged

DarkPenguin

  • Guest
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2008, 11:03:43 pm »

Those seem like overkill just to improve on a G10.

Have you considered a Canon 40D or 50D?  Or a Nikon D200 or D300?  If you like the idea of the G1 you might consider one of the Olympus cameras.  An E3 (or likely the upcoming E30) with a 12-60 would be quite an improvement.

Anywho.  As to the cameras you did ask about you really can't go wrong with any of them.  You might want to find them in a store and give them a try.  Buy the camera that your fingers best find their way around.
Logged

Panopeeper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1805
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2008, 11:36:05 pm »

Quote from: BernardLanguillier
- D700: slightly better high ISO image quality, better AF and more robust build.
I am not writing in favour of Canon (who cares), but this is not correct.

The D700 has 1/4 EV to 1/3 EV advantage over the 5D2 @ ISO 100/200 on pixel level, but that vanishes @ ISO 1600.

In other words, the 5D2 noise does not need to be "compensated for" by downresing at higher ISO, i.e. the 5D2 is plainly better.

However, I see better lenses on the Nikon side, up to mid-range. Canon does not have any decent short lens, and the new Zeiss 21mm is a year away.

If I were to staret a new system now, I would buy the 5D2 with the Nikon 14.24mm f/2.8, or the new Zeiss 21mm with Nikon mount.
Logged
Gabor

Daniel Browning

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2008, 01:09:00 am »

Quote from: Panopeeper
Canon does not have any decent short lens

If you define decent like 99% of the photographers out there, I'd agree. But the last 1% are crazy, like me, and think f/1.4 and faster are the only decent focal ratios for a wide angle, such as 24mm.  I would have switched to Nikon months ago if it weren't for the 24mm f/1.4.
Logged
--Daniel

mcfoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 940
    • http://montalbetticampbell.com
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2008, 01:44:04 am »

Hi
Been a Canon user for 32 years now with the FD & now the EOS system. I have never used Nikon & they used to be the market leader before the EOS range came out. I think the 5DII is a bench mark in DSLR with motion included. Both are very good & I will stay with Canon. Also I do believe that the USB is the way to go in the future. When USB 3.0 comes out it will be 10x faster than the current version.
Thanks Denis
« Last Edit: December 11, 2008, 07:17:51 am by mcfoto »
Logged
Denis Montalbetti
Montalbetti+Campbell [

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2008, 04:47:03 am »

I think the best advice given here is to make sure you get what you need for your shooting style and situation. Cameras are now getting so good that it doesn't matter what you shoot, the image quality is there and the pixels are there, from the Canon 1D(s)3 series, which includes the new 5D2, and the Nikon D3 series forward, except that Nikon just now got with the pixel game. Given the cameras that have come out in the last year to year and a half, you're good as far as image quality and extra pixels to crop or pack together in A3 sized prints so that most any noise is not an issue when printed. I printed a few "noisy" images in shadow areas after some Lightroom and PS noise removal, and I mean some really quick hit the button move the slider stuff, and at 12x18, I couldn't see any noise, especially in portrait stuff. They do have a different look, but it's all good it seems these days. No one seems to be bitching about processed and printed images anyway.

Again, the best advice given here is to pick the camera that best suits your needs, and just go with it. If you can wait six months, it will be interesting to see what Canon will offer in spring, since I doubt lots of people are going to fork out 8K US for the 1DS3 when they can get 3 5DMKIIs for less money. I know first handed that pro photographers in Manhattan choose several 5Ds over the DsMKII when the 5D hit the market for quality vs price point. Point being, Canon MUST come out with something that will blow us away to get 8K for a camera ever again. Although tests I've sen recently put the general image quality of the 1DS3 ever so slightly above the 5D2, the price isn't justified anymore for the 1DS3 (unless you just have to have the best sealing).

As Bernard said, the 5D2 is a landmark camera in more ways than the 5D was because for one, you get 21MP and motion, quality motion. I really don't know where cameras in the 35mm format can go from here, except better and better dynamic range and lower, high ISO noise. But again, the leaps in quality are getting so close together now, it's beginning to be a non issue. Functionality, such as ergonomics, FPS, etc. are the thing that matter most now. Maybe they will put CAD and CGI programs embedded in the cameras so you can automatically change the model's, car's, etc. ligihting and shadow pattern and color?

Come to think of it, I haven't wet swabbed my 1DS3 since I bought it six months ago, and the images are clean. Just a point showing how good cameras are getting all around. It is the day of the digital for sure.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2008, 04:51:23 am by dwdallam »
Logged

mcrepsej

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 74
    • http://www.iversenfoto.dk
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2008, 04:59:26 am »

....and do not forget Nikon Capture NX2 as an amazing tool for rawfiles.

McRepsej
Logged

Plekto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 551
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2008, 02:26:55 pm »

I'm going to confuse things a bit more and add the Sony/Minolta lineup into the mix(A900 being the best of course, but possibly too expensive).  Mostly because there are a lot of older good prime lenses that will fit it.  And I just don't like Canon at all.  The few lenses that they have that are superb are a small fortune.   The stuff that mere mortals can afford is hopelessly average by comparison.
Logged

Kagetsu

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 202
    • Refractive Labs
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2008, 09:01:44 pm »

I think for the first time in the digital age the two major players are par for par, there's no doubt in my mind that in the future (most likely next two years) Sony will also be entering the same complete field, or will be very close.
That said, Sony right now in the lower to entry pro levels do have some very competitive units too, plus they have those fantastic lenses.

My suggestion is of course, to try each one on the handling merits over most of the other stuff.
Logged

Yoram from Berlin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101
    • Yoram Roth Photography
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2008, 01:33:17 pm »

The Sony, Canon, and Nikon cameras with full-frame sensors are all exceptional cameras, proof that competition is good for the consumer.

...but technical specs cannot be the sole deciding factor. You need to go to a well-sorted store, and then hold each of these cameras, and really get a sense for how they feel in your hand.
Logged

GregW

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 306
    • http://
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2008, 06:45:24 pm »

Whatever you decision you are unlikely to regret it. It's a reality that in your price range both Nikon and Canon have excellent offerings. Technical differences are likely to be nuanced rather than significant. At 300% on your computer screen, you are going to see small differences. Hung on a wall, mounted, mated, open or behind glass an A3 or A2 print is unlikely reveal whether it was taken with a Canon or a Nikon.

You are going to limited by your creativity and your ability to deploy it, rather than the ebb and flow of Canon and Nikon's product lines. Relative to your G10, a 5D Mk II or D700 and lenses is a considerable investment. With that in mind you need to make a thorough evaluation of how each camera will perform at 4am, when you are half way up a mountain trying to catch the fast moving morning light

Beyond how it feels in your hand - I'd argue that it's more important to ascertain how well it performs on a tripod for a fine art landscape photographer - dig deeper and consider the ergonomics of operation:

- is there a mirror lock-up feature, how does it function
- can I tweak the focus ring to achieve good manual focus or do I need to switch the lens to manual
- how easy is it to take a custom white balance measurement
- is auto ISO important, how does it work
- landscape cameras are nearly always used on a tripod. Is it easy to focus with the LCD screen using a live view mode
- is it easy to store and then access your favorite combinations of settings. Can they be assigned to a dedicated button or dial
- can I do all of the above with gloves on
- if I drop it on a rock, will it break, if it does how long will it take to be repaired.

The list isn't exhaustive, but hopefully you get the point. You might find it helpful to download the camera manuals. Check the relevant sections. Most people here will have had previous generation SLRs and will already know the 'logic' their camera maker likes to use. You don't.

Armed, not with the technical specifications but the features you need, and how they are operated you can go to a good camera store and make an objective decision about which model will suit YOU best. Only after that point will we castigate you for not buying the brand we have each chosen to use
« Last Edit: December 14, 2008, 06:54:23 pm by GregW »
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2008, 09:43:22 pm »

Wait. In a few months there will be newer cameras announced and I would say probably much cheaper. I doubt Canon will ever get 8K out of a FF camera EVER again. I don't care if it comes out with noise levels the same as the 5D MKII and 32 MPs. The price difference just won't be worth it to most pros and virtually all simipros and prosumers. A testament to this is how fast the 5D killed the sales of the 1DSMKII.

Some will say to this advice that "You could wait forever to get a new and better camera" but this is wrong headed. The advances in IQ are slowing and the next generation cameras will be cheaper than those today and offer slightly better IQ, or MPs, ergonomics, etc. But the IQ/MP race is slowing down or reaching equilibrium. What I mean is that yes, you could wait for that 50MP FF camera, but it will be so slightly better than the 32MP or even the current 21-24 MPs that it just won't matter anymore, as far a image quality goes. That was not true 4 years ago, where each camera update actually did produce a better image. For example, from the 20D to the 5D. That sort of leap isn't happening anymore. IQ improvements will be more incremental and linear instead of geometrical and groundbreaking.

If I could wait and was in for a new camera, I'd definitely wait for spring announcements.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2008, 10:05:38 pm by dwdallam »
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #16 on: December 14, 2008, 11:23:35 pm »

ADVANTAGES OF THE D700

(1) Interfaces with the best wide-angle zoom on the market, the Nikkor 14-24 F2.4.

(2) Autobrackets up to 9 frames with a 1 stop interval at 5 frames per second, or greater with battery pack. (Ideal for merge to HDR and better for sports action).

(3) Flexible ISO bracketing. You can wander around with camera in manual mode, aperture at F8 and shutter speed at 1/200th. The camera will adjust ISO for correct exposure. (I think I have this right. Correct me if I'm wrong.)

ADVANTAGES OF THE 5D2

(1) Built-in HD video mode.

(2) Higher resolution for big prints or severe cropping. Can double up as a cropped format camera, producing quality on a par with the 20D.

Tough decision   .
Logged

hassiman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 156
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #17 on: December 14, 2008, 11:33:10 pm »

I think you are correct... now that there are a number of quality FF sensor players in the game the astronomical prices of the past will not be maintainable... not to mention the rancid state of the economy,  I also see that the Panasonic G1 design will have a profound effect on DSLR design as the mirror and prism can be done away with.  This also means that lens design will change for the better as finally an SLR will be able to have a WA design where the rear element 's distance from the plane of focus is = to the focal length of the lens.

Everything is looking better and better.
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2008, 12:11:57 am »

Quote from: hassiman
Everything is looking better and better.

True! With computer related products, everything gets better as time progresses. But that wasn't your original question. If you'd asked, 'should I buy now or should I wait?', the answer would be, if you want to use the product now, you have to buy now. If you don't need the product now, then wait, and you'll get a better deal.
Logged

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11311
    • Echophoto
About to get a DSLR: Nikon or Canon?
« Reply #19 on: December 15, 2008, 01:13:45 am »

Hi,

A fast lens is of course not the same as a sharp lens. A fast lens can be a sharp lens, when stopped down, but no fast lens is really sharp at maximum aperture, AFAIK.

Erik


Quote from: Daniel Browning
If you define decent like 99% of the photographers out there, I'd agree. But the last 1% are crazy, like me, and think f/1.4 and faster are the only decent focal ratios for a wide angle, such as 24mm.  I would have switched to Nikon months ago if it weren't for the 24mm f/1.4.
Logged
Erik Kaffehr
 
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up