Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Critical Image Evaluation  (Read 7525 times)

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13983
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
Critical Image Evaluation
« on: September 08, 2005, 08:54:51 am »

Not a pro, but I'll give it a try nonetheless...

An interesting crop for sure. I guess that it is close to working for me, but I would perhaps have prefered the boat to be centered left/right, and a tiny bit lower in the frame. It feels stuck in the upper corner of the image somehow.

Because of the very strong vertical component of the image, I would have prefered the reflexion to be converging a little bit less perhaps. Getting a tiny bit lower might make the image more powerful.

A more contrasty image might work also and would give more punch to the reflections. The current approach gives a quiet end of the day feeling that is pleasant though, but the lack of contrast does perhaps induce a slight feel of lack of sharpness.

Cheers,
Bernard

Sabercat04

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 49
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2005, 01:41:50 pm »

Have you thought about cropping the image so you view only the reflection? The crop would then be must below the red buoy (and perhaps a bit on the right side). It would then habe a very abstract, but I think interesting appearance.
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2005, 10:17:37 pm »

OK when you guys say straighten the horizon, I take that to mean the invisible horizon where the water meets the boat, correct?

Also, getting more of the boat into the picture would requeire that I be much higer than I was, like on the top of another boat, in order to get both the mast and reflection in the picture.

Cropping, or retaking the picture if possible, to take out the truncated mast is a GREAT idea--I see that now.

I'll have more questions later, but I have to meet my out of town dad for dinner. See you all soon.
Logged

dazzajl

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 71
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2005, 05:55:26 am »

Quote
I second straightening the horizon, and tweaking the white balance would make the sky a lot less dirty-looking. Or better yet, convert to B&W; that would accentuate the "abstractness" of the image. Then I'd crop the boat just above "Drifter" to get rid of all the clutter on the decks and focus on the reflection.
That was pretty much my first thought about the crop. Wasn't too sure about the B&W conversion but I've just had play with it and it looks rather nice.  :)
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2005, 04:37:35 am »

Quote
I could give you things to do to make your image more to my liking, but I wonder if you took the image to please me?

I know I have an uncommon approach to critiques, but I like to know what the artist was trying to communicate--what they were hoping to say with the image.  Then I can provide comments as how how to make the image say THAT more (from my perspective).

So if you know what you were trying to say with this one, let us know.
I wasn't trying to say anything really. I thought the lighting and reflection was intersting in a serene/isolated sort of manner. It was jsut something I thought people would enjoy seeing and drawing their own ideas from it. Is that a wrong approach to photography?
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2005, 02:53:00 am »

Again, please be critical. Your professional evaluation helps me very much. Nothing you say is taken personally.

http://www.idlethoughtsandchaos.com/photo/
Logged

Geoff Wittig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1023
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2005, 08:34:23 am »

Very nice light, great reflection, good exposure, plenty of visual interest.
On the other hand, the horizon slants down to the left, which is visually disturbing. The clutter and bisected boat in the upper right corner are distracting. Single stray reflection right lower corner also a distraction. And (just my opinion) the dirty-looking sky doesn't really add much. Might be stronger if you cropped a bit tighter, losing some sky and some of the right hand side.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2005, 11:38:44 am »

I agree with some of the other suggestions: Straighten the horizon and crop the right edge (center the boat horizontally).

But then I would do something like the "rule of thirds" vertically: crop the top so that the name of the boat is about one third of the way from the top. This makes it clearer that the reflections are the focus of the image and not the truncated masts. I am not a "rule-of-thirds" junkie, but sometimes it can strengthen an image.

Just my 2 farthings.

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

howard smith

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1237
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2005, 04:12:41 pm »

An interesting image and I think worth the effort.  As others, I would level the boat, crop the boat somewhere around the top of the first deck house roof.  In the reflection, on the right side toward the bottom there is a reflection of something else there.  It might go away if you crop to center the boat left to right.

I think you can crop the upper part of the boat off because there is nothing there that is required to identify this as a boat.  I also see the main subject as the boat's reflection.  The boat at the top merely sets the scene.  I think that is why the boat name in the upper third works.  The main focus is in the reflection which deserves and needs more size than the boat.  Cropping to center the boat gives equal value and weight to ech side of the boat, which is proper since neither dide is more important than the other and the boat is static.

Nice shot.
Logged

Steven M Anthony

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
    • www.smaphoto.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2005, 05:16:45 pm »

I could give you things to do to make your image more to my liking, but I wonder if you took the image to please me?

I know I have an uncommon approach to critiques, but I like to know what the artist was trying to communicate--what they were hoping to say with the image.  Then I can provide comments as how how to make the image say THAT more (from my perspective).

So if you know what you were trying to say with this one, let us know.
Logged
Steve

[url=http://www.smaphoto.co

Jonathan Wienke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5829
    • http://visual-vacations.com/
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2005, 07:08:19 pm »

I second straightening the horizon, and tweaking the white balance would make the sky a lot less dirty-looking. Or better yet, convert to B&W; that would accentuate the "abstractness" of the image. Then I'd crop the boat just above "Drifter" to get rid of all the clutter on the decks and focus on the reflection.
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2005, 10:19:02 pm »

OK when you guys say straighten the horizon, I take that to mean the invisible horizon where the water meets the boat, correct?

Also, getting more of the boat into the picture would requeire that I be much higer than I was, like on the top of another boat, in order to get both the mast and reflection in the picture.

Cropping, or retaking the picture if possible, to take out the truncated mast is a GREAT idea--I see that now.

I'll have more questions later, but I have to meet my out of town dad for dinner. See you all soon.
Logged

BobMcCarthy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2005, 11:37:50 am »

Quote
Quote
send me your email address and I'll send you an image for concideration.

My email is



My servers are closed to the outside so I'll have to sent it directly to you.

bob
Bob,

I'm an amatuer. I don't think you would want me to try and evaluate a photograph, unless there is a reason you would want me too at this level of my skill.
Hehe,

I meant for you to email me YOUR email address as I put your pix through a quick photoshop session and was going to send it back to you for your review
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2005, 04:31:10 am »

OK so one of the things I am hearing is that this is a good image to break the rules with, bye centering the boat and moving the cabin to a higer level which would take out the mast? That makes perfect sense to me if correct.
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2005, 02:03:02 am »

Quote
send me your email address and I'll send you an image for concideration.

My email is

bobmccarthy@isegames.com

My servers are closed to the outside so I'll have to sent it directly to you.

bob
Bob,

I'm an amatuer. I don't think you would want me to try and evaluate a photograph, unless there is a reason you would want me too at this level of my skill.
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2005, 08:29:06 am »

The reflections are great but the truncation of ther yacht's mast is disturbing.

The reflection and the boat take up two halves of the image, Not good.
Logged

BobMcCarthy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2005, 11:32:54 am »

send me your email address and I'll send you an image for concideration.

My email is

bobmccarthy@isegames.com

My servers are closed to the outside so I'll have to sent it directly to you.

bob
Logged

Steven M Anthony

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
    • www.smaphoto.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2005, 05:19:53 pm »

I could give you things to do to make your image more to my liking, but I wonder if you took the image to please me?

I know I have an uncommon approach to critiques, but I like to know what the artist was trying to communicate--what they were hoping to say with the image.  Then I can provide comments as how how to make the image say THAT more (from my perspective).

So if you know what you were trying to say with this one, let us know.
Logged
Steve

[url=http://www.smaphoto.co

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2005, 10:24:04 pm »

OK when you guys say straighten the horizon, I take that to mean the invisible horizon where the water meets the boat, correct?

Also, getting more of the boat into the picture would requeire that I be much higer than I was, like on the top of another boat, in order to get both the mast and reflection in the picture.

Cropping, or retaking the picture if possible, to take out the truncated mast is a GREAT idea--I see that now.

I'll have more questions later, but I have to meet my out of town dad for dinner. See you all soon.
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Critical Image Evaluation
« Reply #19 on: September 10, 2005, 06:01:08 am »

Quote
Quote
Quote
send me your email address and I'll send you an image for concideration.

My email is



My servers are closed to the outside so I'll have to sent it directly to you.

bob
Bob,

I'm an amatuer. I don't think you would want me to try and evaluate a photograph, unless there is a reason you would want me too at this level of my skill.
Hehe,

I meant for you to email me YOUR email address as I put your pix through a quick photoshop session and was going to send it back to you for your review
bob sure, it's forums@idlethoughtsandchaos.com
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up