With all these super high MP backs coming out are people testing what happens when you down res 200 percent or whatever is needed to make the files correctly sized for 95 percent of all applications. Are there any IQ losses involved doing this?
You might to ask this guy what technique he uses... the downsizing problem he is facing is much tougher... http://www.yosemite-17-gigapixels.com/As far as I am concerned, CS3 bi-cubic + Smart sharpen radius 0.2 and strenght 200+% does the trick between 12 and 200 MP.Cheers,Bernard
Bernard,The Barraca Hussein, paying you for that?BlasR
Sorry to correct your spelling, but it is spelled Borat. Both have same amount of experience.
Surely this means that you should match sensor resolution to output size/resolution for highest image quality (baring cropping/artifacts)?For most work that is appearing in a magazine this would make ideal resolution (including a bit extra for cropping) to be around 18mpx?
Okay - going to set you to ignore from now on. No point in reading your posts anymore. I'll bet you didn't even vote or read up on the issues anyhow.
Thread time of death: 11:09 AM MST