Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: DxO 5.3  (Read 10835 times)

martin.storz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
    • http://www.thepubliceyeblog.blogspot.com
DxO 5.3
« Reply #20 on: November 10, 2008, 03:15:41 am »

Quote from: NikosR
First of all, I don't trust ANYTHING dpr says. I'm not saying they are wrong in this case I just don't trust anything they say because they have been proved very wrong in cases.

Now, who says that ACR does not apply any NR even when the NR sliders are set to zero? Could you state your source? Reading some of Mr. Schewe's comments in this forum gives me the impression that it does (during demosaicing). I might be misinterpreting his comments but if I were you I would double check before making the comments you did.


NikosR,
I never said, that ACR does not apply any NR.
I said, ACR did (in this special case) a slightly better job, because the result, although very grainy, looks for me more natural.

Logged

NikosR

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 622
    • http://
DxO 5.3
« Reply #21 on: November 10, 2008, 04:17:50 am »

I took it that stating that DxO applies NR and quoting dpr saying that DPP does that too, both in the context of comparing to ACR, implied that ACR doesn't...  I don't think that was an unreasonable reading of your statements.
Logged
Nikos

macote

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
DxO 5.3
« Reply #22 on: November 10, 2008, 11:11:16 pm »

Quote from: httivals
No.  If you're not using a lens that has been calibrated to the camera (i.e. a Nikon body with the 14-24mm lens; or a Canon lens like the17-40mm with the Canon 5D), then DXO is not worthwhile, IMHO.  OTOH, when you have a lens and body that has been profiled, the results are fantastic!



Thank you very much for your  answer.

Marc-André
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up