Pages: 1 ... 202 203 [204] 205 206 ... 220   Go Down

Author Topic: Recent Professional Works  (Read 1228329 times)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13246
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4060 on: January 01, 2013, 12:46:39 PM »

Whatever, it's a pretty girl and a nice photograph; let's start the new year with some spirit of goodwill.

Let's even chill out with some music.

http://youtu.be/IhH1zImBBfk

Prepare yourselves for the girl at the end - she can really do it, and should think about taking up jazz...

Rob C

Hulyss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 610
    • H.Bowman
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4061 on: January 01, 2013, 01:31:07 PM »

Happy New year Rob C :) And more girl for you !!





From the same shoot (this one haven't been selected).
Logged
Kind Regards -  Hulyss Bowman | hulyssbowman.com |

Conner999

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 559
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4062 on: January 01, 2013, 01:49:18 PM »

Very nice.
Logged

FredBGG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1633
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4063 on: January 01, 2013, 02:20:39 PM »

Oh please, on your website it's under "publications" Vogue Italy and you obviously choose to post the photo with their logo on it, when really it's just a user submission to their "photo of the day" on the website. Heck, it didn't even get selected for that and is only in their "archives" along with every other submission. You look pretty silly trying to pass it off as anything more than that when it's painfully obvious that the photo is nowhere near the level of being in Vogue, just saying. I see you're pretty new at this though, and modesty doesn't seem to be one of your strong suits, so I don't expect you'll take this to heart. Happy new Year to you too.

@amsp.

Hulyss is showing the photo exactly as it appears on the Vogue Italia website. Vogue.it is a Vogue publication.
Also he is not trying to peddle it as a print publication. On his website it is even clearly labeled as a portfolio selection.

Quote
Vogue Italy - December 2012 - Portfolio Selection

While the images are user submitted they are only published on the website when they are selected by the PhotoVogue section art department after a pretty selective process.

There is really no reason to put him down for posting a lovely photo on this thread or how he has it on his website.
It's a nice picture and vogue thought is was worthy for publication in its section about Photography.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2013, 03:23:08 PM by FredBGG »
Logged

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4064 on: January 01, 2013, 02:36:58 PM »

Hello,

I wish you a wonderful end of this year. See you next year :)



Pretty model.  This is offered as constructive criticism:  watch the fly aways. When you are shooting its almost impossible to watch the fly aways because you are doing a thousand other things, so your stylist/hair/MUA needs to be on the ball to take care of the details. This is why tethering is important for fashion.

Happy New Year!
Logged

Hulyss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 610
    • H.Bowman
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4065 on: January 01, 2013, 03:02:25 PM »

Hello TMARK,

Your criticism is very welcome :) By "fly aways" you mean the little hairs who are not disciplined ?? Yes I fight with them sometimes when they come one the face or close to the ears ^^

This is something very important indeed. PP on this after the shoot is so a waste of time ! Will remember it.

Unfortunately I do not have a hair stylist for now but I'm working on it :)

If one of your client want to work with this model here is her folio. She's a friend of me from Elite Milan :

http://www.elitemodel.it/details.aspx?modelid=606592&subid=2856&mainsubid=2856&lang=en&nav=2&modl=&indx=0&sexid=2&letter=E&show=2&catid=9

PS: Beware, amsp will say i do not deserve shooting Elite models ^^ (just kinding dear amsp ;) )
« Last Edit: January 01, 2013, 03:11:06 PM by Hulyss »
Logged
Kind Regards -  Hulyss Bowman | hulyssbowman.com |

chaosphere

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
    • matias antoniassi photography
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4066 on: January 01, 2013, 03:56:20 PM »

Hulyss you did not answered my question  ;)
Logged
Matías Antoniassi
www.matantoniassi.com

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13246
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4067 on: January 01, 2013, 04:37:21 PM »


If one of your client want to work with this model here is her folio. She's a friend of me from Elite Milan :

http://www.elitemodel.it/details.aspx?modelid=606592&subid=2856&mainsubid=2856&lang=en&nav=2&modl=&indx=0&sexid=2&letter=E&show=2&catid=9



Wish she was a friend of mine! Help change the situation here on St Helena, Mallorca, Baleares!

;-)

Rob C

Hulyss

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 610
    • H.Bowman
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4068 on: January 01, 2013, 04:49:27 PM »

Hulyss you did not answered my question  ;)

Hello Chaosphere,

This is done with a digital camera !

I do not communicate on my material. I shoot that's the most important to my eyes :)


Wish she was a friend of mine! Help change the situation here on St Helena, Mallorca, Baleares!

;-)

Rob C

Every things is possible. I'm sure there is some pretty models to spot were you live, to be transmitted to Elite or Ford head hunters ;)
Logged
Kind Regards -  Hulyss Bowman | hulyssbowman.com |

MJSPhoto

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
    • Morgan J Segal Photography
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4069 on: January 01, 2013, 05:19:20 PM »

Was it done with MF ?
Hulyss you did not answered my question  

I don't get why people are hassling this person

What difference does it make if it is MF? People have long been posting images from 35mm, video cameras, etc, so why are you suddenly "policing" the thread?
I don't shoot MF anymore but this is one of the more interesting threads on the internets (and frankly this thread  probably shouldn't even be in the MF section IMO)
« Last Edit: January 01, 2013, 05:41:15 PM by MJSPhoto »
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8443
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4070 on: January 01, 2013, 05:54:24 PM »

... What difference does it make if it is MF? People have long been posting images from 35mm, video cameras, etc,... this is one of the more interesting threads on the internets...

It is... precisely because of the exclusion of (us) amateurs with non-MF. Those who occasionally post something else are well-established professionals who predominantly shoot (and post) MF and are paid for it.

Quote
... (and frankly this thread  probably shouldn't even be in the MF section IMO)

But it is. And as long as it is, pro-wannabes with Sigma's one-trick pony need not apply.

On the other hand, you (or anyone else) are welcome to start a new thread: Recent (Almost) Professional Works with Anything-Goes Cameras

MJSPhoto

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
    • Morgan J Segal Photography
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4071 on: January 01, 2013, 06:01:52 PM »

It is... precisely because of the exclusion of (us) amateurs with non-MF. Those who occasionally post something else are well-established professionals who predominantly shoot (and post) MF and are paid for it.

But it is. And as long as it is, pro-wannabes with Sigma's one-trick pony need not apply.

On the other hand, you (or anyone else) are welcome to start a new thread: Recent (Almost) Professional Works with Anything-Goes Cameras

 ::) Shooting with medium format does not make one pro and plenty of people get paid to shoot smaller formats, myself included
« Last Edit: January 01, 2013, 06:03:52 PM by MJSPhoto »
Logged

K.C.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 671
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4072 on: January 01, 2013, 06:29:38 PM »

Nice to see the LL community offer it's usual cheerful demeanor on the first day of the new year.



Logged

Gel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 240
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4073 on: January 01, 2013, 06:35:25 PM »

Rules are rules.

However I did see a behind the scenes of a Next Catalog shoot and the guy was using a 1DX, a guest photographer on Top Model using a 5D2 etc so I think it would be a perfectly good idea to have a thread with 35mm cameras, paid work only mind you.

 

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8443
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4074 on: January 01, 2013, 06:37:35 PM »

::) Shooting with medium format does not make one pro and plenty of people get paid to shoot smaller formats, myself included

Nobody said otherwise. However, this thread is about professional photography done with MF. For any other combination, feel free to start a new thread.

chaosphere

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
    • matias antoniassi photography
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4075 on: January 01, 2013, 06:38:40 PM »

Hey, I just wanted to know if it was MF. As you say, they are some posts here (excellent photos btw) where it was done with other cameras : cool. But when I come to a part of the forum, the MF section, I want to see what I was looking for...
 :)
שלם
Logged
Matías Antoniassi
www.matantoniassi.com

MJSPhoto

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
    • Morgan J Segal Photography
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4076 on: January 01, 2013, 06:55:40 PM »

Well gee, the name of the forum is Luminous LANDSCAPE, so perhaps only landscape photos should be posted....

If you're going to be such sticklers for the "rules" it seems more than few people shouldn't be allowed to post since they got rid of their MF cameras

aaronleitz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4077 on: January 01, 2013, 08:36:50 PM »

Nobody said otherwise. However, this thread is about professional photography done with MF. For any other combination, feel free to start a new thread.

No it's not. It's about professional photography done with any camera any format. Plenty of non-MF work has been posted over the years. Read the original post.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8443
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4078 on: January 01, 2013, 09:15:33 PM »

No it's not. It's about professional photography done with any camera any format. Plenty of non-MF work has been posted over the years. Read the original post.

I did. Found nothing there to the opposite. It never said "any format."

Which part of "Luminous Landscape Forum > Equipment & Techniques > Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography > Recent Professional Works" you don't get? I already explained why certain exceptions were accepted (hint: because they belong to professionals who build their reputation on the forum and outside of it with their medium format work). And even in those cases such postings were questioned. What we are discussing here is neither medium format, nor exactly professional, as others already pointed out.

aaronleitz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #4079 on: January 01, 2013, 10:39:15 PM »

I did. Found nothing there to the opposite. It never said "any format."

Which part of "Luminous Landscape Forum > Equipment & Techniques > Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography > Recent Professional Works" you don't get? I already explained why certain exceptions were accepted (hint: because they belong to professionals who build their reputation on the forum and outside of it with their medium format work). And even in those cases such postings were questioned. What we are discussing here is neither medium format, nor exactly professional, as others already pointed out.

The camera/format issue was settled years ago - read page 8 of this 205 page thread. There are plenty of other exchanges on the following pages. All the images I've posted in the thread are 35mm and have never been questioned (page 132 for example). Nobody cares.

This thread was started back before the "pro forum" existed and at the time the MF forum was the defacto forum for professionals. Maybe the mods can move this thread to the pro forum since nowhere in Dustblue's original post does it state that the recent professional works displayed must be shot on MF. Only that they be of a professional nature. Quote:  "We don't care whether it's a commissioned work or a self promotion(personal) one, as long as you are serious and proud of it, it would have a place here!"
« Last Edit: January 01, 2013, 10:40:49 PM by aaronleitz »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 202 203 [204] 205 206 ... 220   Go Up