Pages: 1 ... 192 193 [194] 195 196 ... 220   Go Down

Author Topic: Recent Professional Works  (Read 1246056 times)

Dick Roadnight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3860 on: October 06, 2012, 04:28:09 AM »

Well two different questions. First as you all know, what you see in location is not what the camera sees, so the quotation that t is natural" doesn't really is. When you see a slight tint of blue in real live it translate into a deep blue as you are balancing for tungsten. So it is never natural.
In my case if I can deal with it in camera at location, is faster and easier. If I can not then I'd do it in post.

Some clients allow for more natural reflections and mix lighting, others just don't allow for it. Some clients like little retouching, others ask for a lot.

The problem with mix lighting is that, as I said before was not that intense in real as it shows in film or digital. So for me in this case I would try to avoid or lower its intensity at location or in post, what ever is handy to me.
See this example, first the untouched image then the final. That blue was never like that for real, so it has to be solved.



...and back to my original comment on Scott's picture: does anyone "do it professionally" by taking different shots for different light sources (e.g. daylight, tungsten and fluorescent) so that each light source can be independently light-balanced before merging the shots? This, of course, give you a very wide range of options to satisfy a clients requirements.

Did any of you do separate exposures for each (filtered or gelled) light source on one sheet of film?
Logged
Hasselblad H4, Sinar P3 monorail view camera, Schneider Apo-digitar lenses

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
    • Website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3861 on: October 06, 2012, 04:33:50 AM »

It is just Professional Photography in the Digital World.

Move away from that monitor and you'll find real workspaces, real homes, real cars and thankfully real women in a Real World.
Logged

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
    • Website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3862 on: October 06, 2012, 08:33:14 AM »

I should perhaps add that I can and do appreciate the level skill that is a part of making many of the images I see here. However I can't help feeling a sense of irony when I hear commercial photographers bemoaning CGI and the effect it has had on their livelihood and yet see those same photographers imitating the look.

Anyways, Ive been around long enough to realise it's all cyclical, hopefully the next cycle will bring a little more in the way of humanity.
Logged

Scott Hargis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 220
    • Scott Hargis Photo
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3863 on: October 06, 2012, 11:06:52 AM »

Dick, I can tell you that lots of people work that way.
As I said on a different forum recently, in my opinion, what combination of techniques you use doesn't matter. The point is to be in charge of a managed process, not just throwing shit at the wall and hoping that what sticks looks good. Pre-visualize the shot, and then go through whatever steps you need/want to get there. If the end result matches what was in your head....then you're doing it right.

semillerimages

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • http://www.semillerimages.com
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3864 on: October 06, 2012, 01:52:28 PM »

Mr. Ezra,
Please forgive my formality :)
Your images are absolutely stunning, some of the most impressive nudes I've seen that are all about form yet have that slight hint of eroticism.
What do you do with these images? Gallery? Personal work? Sell to the model?
This new set probably is the most impressive that I've seen by the way, as I lurk away on here :)
Congratulations on a perfection of your style!

*steve
Logged
semillerimages.com

MichaelEzra

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 766
    • http://www.michaelezra.com
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3865 on: October 06, 2012, 02:25:20 PM »

Thank you, Steve. I guess this would get categorized as personal work, I don't get to do much with images besides making them. some time ago I was selling prints on eBay, will probably try to revive that. I had a few attempts to work with galleries a few years ago, but that was not fruitful.  The largest exhibit I had "recently" was in 2009 in Moscow on FotoForum with 29 prints, that went very well. You can also view it on my site under Exhibits/Concept of Form. Having a day job unrelated to photography leaves little time for it, especially in the last few years. I still have many untouched negatives going back to year 2000; hopefully, some day will go through. If time permits, I plan to consolidate various projects into a book and also write an instructional book on Sculptural Photography on the basis of masterclass given on the same FotoForum-2009.
There are more levitation works that are still in the RAW, was actually hoping to process a few this weekend:)

semillerimages

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • http://www.semillerimages.com
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3866 on: October 06, 2012, 02:31:42 PM »

I love to buy that book :)
Thanks for the rapid reply!
Logged
semillerimages.com

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14425
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3867 on: October 06, 2012, 02:44:33 PM »

Move away from that monitor and you'll find real workspaces, real homes, real cars and thankfully real women in a Real World.




Keith, you're messing with my head again: I tried clicking on Real World looking for those real women, and nothing happened... just like in Real Life.

;-)

Rob C

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
    • Website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3868 on: October 06, 2012, 02:53:49 PM »

Keith, you're messing with my head again: I tried clicking on Real World looking for those real women, and nothing happened... just like in Real Life.

They're out there, Rob, in the real world, just don't expect them to respond to clicks ;-)
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14425
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3869 on: October 06, 2012, 02:58:57 PM »

They're out there, Rob, in the real world, just don't expect them to respond to clicks ;-)


Yet to try clicks, but they long stopped responding to the snapping of fingers - or even of suspender belts. But they don't wear them anymore, I believe... so much gets lost with progress!

;-)

Rob C

bcooter

  • Guest
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3870 on: October 06, 2012, 03:04:03 PM »

The character, light and post, all look very coherent.


Thank you Michael, but as you know this is the reality of an open forum is we all live in a glass house so some people will love what we show, some not.  

Some of it's constructive and I like that, but all is personal opinion and that's fine also.

Anyway

The real story of this image



is commercial work and commercial work brings with it a different set of discipline especially today with a major eye on expenses.

If this image (which is one of many) was shot completely on location,  the cost of permitting, securing parking, adding RV's,  police, grip trucks, catering, running cable, generators, would have impacted this portion of the shoot by a lot.

Then you have the issues of crowd control, wind, overtime because it's evening, etc. etc.  Also this project has a video component so the cost exponentially goes up with video due the motion requirements and added crew.  

Do this on 4 locations and the numbers add up. 

I know because two years ago using some of the same or close to areas in san francisco we were into those prices and honestly the imagery is not any more "real" looking or compelling because commercial work comes with it a lot of selection by committee, changes, swapping out subjects, expressions, etc.  In other words a lot of post production.

When it came time to create the main subject for the image referenced, in discussion with the creative group/client  we could either light and place the subject in studio to look organic,with more realistic lighting, or shoot it as if we added key light for a more stylistic approach.  It was decided by all to use a more stylistic approach.

Consequently, these two images were shot on location with some minor to major supplemental lighting to look organic and regardless of what we did they still require a great deal of post production, because . . . that's the standard of the industry today.



When I look at Michael's lovely nudes the technician in me sees post work and physical construction, though the artist just sees pretty images. (which is the way it should be).

I don't shoot a  great deal of nudes to compare it with, but this image



Was shot "organic" and has virtually no retouching.  Even the lighting is from practicals moved into position.

Do I think it's better or worse than other imagery . . . NO, I just think it is what it is.

IMO

BC
« Last Edit: October 06, 2012, 07:17:07 PM by bcooter »
Logged

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3871 on: October 06, 2012, 11:14:25 PM »




Was shot "organic" and has virtually no retouching.  Even the lighting is from practicals moved into position.



My wife looked just like that until, you know, we had kids.  Seriously, freaked me out for a second.  I was like "She never told me about this."

Logged

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
    • Website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3872 on: October 08, 2012, 12:49:05 PM »

Another from Lovokomeio.



H3D11-22...but really, who cares?
« Last Edit: October 08, 2012, 01:20:32 PM by KLaban »
Logged

HarperPhotos

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1310
    • http://www.harperphoto.com
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3873 on: October 08, 2012, 03:41:40 PM »

Hello,

Shoot with a Mamiya RZ body, Leaf Aptus 75 back and 180mm SB lens with tilt/shift adaptor.

Question is. But is it art?

Just kidding.

Cheers

Simon
Logged
Simon Harper
Harper Photographics Ltd
http://www.harperphoto.com
http://www.facebook.com/harper.photographics

Auckland, New Zealand

jsch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 481
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3874 on: October 08, 2012, 04:06:24 PM »

Hello,
...

Question is. But is it art?

...


Hi Simon,

if there is a curator who says it is art, it is. If there is no curator saying that, I'm sorry it isn't.

You see, it is very easy to decide whether someting is art or not.

Best,
Johannes
Logged

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
    • Website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3875 on: October 08, 2012, 04:19:34 PM »

Art is married to Hilda and fixes our cars.
Logged

ACH DIGITAL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 605
    • http://www.achdigital.com
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3876 on: October 09, 2012, 09:54:43 AM »

Hello,

Shoot with a Mamiya RZ body, Leaf Aptus 75 back and 180mm SB lens with tilt/shift adaptor.

Question is. But is it art?

Just kidding.

Cheers

Simon

Hello Simon, nice work. There was a time when a "Tabasco" commercial image was print in poster size for decorative use. That could be.
Logged
Antonio Chagin
www.achdigital.com

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
    • Website
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3877 on: October 18, 2012, 11:21:50 AM »

Peoples, I've never felt entirely comfortable posting non-commissioned work here. I'm wondering if there's a consensus that this thread should be reserved for commissioned commercial work only? Anyone have strong opinion either way?
Logged

Kirk Gittings

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1555
    • http://www.KirkGittings.com
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3878 on: October 18, 2012, 11:26:07 AM »

in my opinion, what combination of techniques you use doesn't matter. The point is to be in charge of a managed process, not just throwing shit at the wall and hoping that what sticks looks good. Pre-visualize the shot, and then go through whatever steps you need/want to get there. If the end result matches what was in your head....then you're doing it right.



Bang on.....
Logged
Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM
LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)

TMARK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1841
Re: Recent Professional Works
« Reply #3879 on: October 18, 2012, 11:39:48 AM »

Peoples, I've never felt entirely comfortable posting non-commissioned work here. I'm wondering if there's a consensus that this thread should be reserved for commissioned commercial work only? Anyone have strong opinion either way?

Spec work is fine, or uncommissioned editorials, or promo pieces, but I'm never averse to seeing good images, no matter its reason for being.  I just don't want to see Canon cat pics.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 192 193 [194] 195 196 ... 220   Go Up