Have a look and let me know what you think. Any C&C is welcome, either in regards to the work, or in regards to the website.
Nice work, Joergen. Very clean assembly and post. My only nit is that most all panoramics are best viewed large because their success lies in their details, which are lost on web images and even 2-page spreads. Your web site shows the images much better, but nothing close to a 96" wide print.[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=225344\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
very impressive work. how many pictures you used for a final image?[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=225576\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I checked your websites and all can I say it's wow!.. What computer you use to handle all that amount of pixels ? Also if you don't mind how you get rid of the noise from long exposure.[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=225645\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Thanks for your comment... My current machine is a tricked-out iMac with a mountain of ext HDs, soon to be replaced with a mac pro. The NR is a side product of the HDR/exposure fusion process.[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=226118\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I know that the web is only a shadow of the real thing. The real things (96-120in) are hanging in Chelsea and Brooklyn art galleries right now.
Which ones? I'd love to see them "live", so to speak. I'll be in NYC in from December 19th or thereabouts; will the exhibits still be open then?Mike[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]