Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Which MF system?  (Read 8585 times)

ChrisJR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
    • http://
Which MF system?
« on: September 26, 2008, 09:10:19 am »

It's only a matter of months until I will be upgrading to a MFDB system and I'm undecided about which to invest in. I don't want to spend too much and the new package's for the H3D-31 are around the ideal price.

However, is it work maybe spending a little more/less elsewhere? I primarily shoot a lot of panoramic, architecture, portrait and product photos. I don't want the bulk of a view camera and my previous MF camera was a Hasselblad 503CW which I absolutely loved.


What do you recommend?

Thanks
Chris
Logged

Graham Mitchell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2281
Which MF system?
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2008, 09:16:52 am »

Do you need high flash sync speed? Do you want a waist-level finder? Are there any 'must have' focal lengths for your work? Do you often switch between vertical and horizontal while shooting? Do you want to use a particular program for developing your raw files?

Without knowing these preferences and a lot more, no-one can give you a real answer.
Logged

clawery

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 512
    • http://www.captureintegration.com  / www.chrislawery.com
Which MF system?
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2008, 09:20:29 am »

Quote
It's only a matter of months until I will be upgrading to a MFDB system and I'm undecided about which to invest in. I don't want to spend too much and the new package's for the H3D-31 are around the ideal price.

However, is it work maybe spending a little more/less elsewhere? I primarily shoot a lot of panoramic, architecture, portrait and product photos. I don't want the bulk of a view camera and my previous MF camera was a Hasselblad 503CW which I absolutely loved.
What do you recommend?

Thanks
Chris
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Chris,

Please feel free to give us a call at Capture Integration to talk about any Phase One products.
You can ask for Lance Schad or I.  We would be glad to help you.

Chris Lawery
Sales Manager
chris@captureintegration.com
[a href=\"http://www.captureintegration.com]Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer of the Year[/url]

877-217-9870 | National  Atlanta / Miami
404-234-5195 | Cell  
Sign up for our Newsletter | Read Our Latest Newsletter
Logged

ChrisJR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
    • http://
Which MF system?
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2008, 09:32:29 am »

Quote
Do you need high flash sync speed? Do you want a waist-level finder? Are there any 'must have' focal lengths for your work? Do you often switch between vertical and horizontal while shooting? Do you want to use a particular program for developing your raw files?

Without knowing these preferences and a lot more, no-one can give you a real answer.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
A high flash sync speed would be ideal. I really miss shooting with a WLF and would probably shoot 90% of my photography in this way but having the option to switch between a WLF and angled finder would be perfect. The vast majority of my photography is now shot vertically but with occasional horizontal imagery.

I primarly use CS3 for editing RAW files but have started messing around with Lightoom and Capture 1 recently. Happy to give any editing programme a try.

Focal length... Equivalents to around 15mm and 85mm in 35mm format would be ideal.

Thanks


Quote
Chris,

Please feel free to give us a call at Capture Integration to talk about any Phase One products.
You can ask for Lance Schad or I.  We would be glad to help you.

Chris Lawery
Sales Manager
chris@captureintegration.com
[a href=\"http://www.captureintegration.com]Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer of the Year[/url]

877-217-9870 | National  Atlanta / Miami
404-234-5195 | Cell 
Sign up for our Newsletter | Read Our Latest Newsletter
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224589\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Thanks Chris.

I forgot to mention I'm based in the UK but I would be interested in a refurbished back perhaps. I've noticed the prices on your website for a refurb back are an awful lot cheaper than here in the UK.

Will be in touch soon.

Thanks
Chris.
Logged

Graham Mitchell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2281
Which MF system?
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2008, 10:03:42 am »

Quote
A high flash sync speed would be ideal. I really miss shooting with a WLF and would probably shoot 90% of my photography in this way but having the option to switch between a WLF and angled finder would be perfect. The vast majority of my photography is now shot vertically but with occasional horizontal imagery.

Then the Hy6/Afi sounds like it could be the camera for you. Worth investigating.

Quote
I primarly use CS3 for editing RAW files but have started messing around with Lightoom and Capture 1 recently. Happy to give any editing programme a try.

I ask because some systems use DNG aw files, which means you can use CS3, LR, etc to develop the files. Choices there are Sinar and Hasselblad, afaik.

Quote
Focal length... Equivalents to around 15mm and 85mm in 35mm format would be ideal.

You won't find any MF system with a 15mm equivalent. Look at the new Rodenstock 23mm lens and put that on a compact vew camera, and you'll have stunning quality (if the other lenses in the series are anything to go by) plus movements.

As for the 85mm equivalent, all systems offer that.
Logged

ChrisJR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
    • http://
Which MF system?
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2008, 10:39:48 am »

Quote
Then the Hy6/Afi sounds like it could be the camera for you. Worth investigating.
I ask because some systems use DNG aw files, which means you can use CS3, LR, etc to develop the files. Choices there are Sinar and Hasselblad, afaik.
You won't find any MF system with a 15mm equivalent. Look at the new Rodenstock 23mm lens and put that on a compact vew camera, and you'll have stunning quality (if the other lenses in the series are anything to go by) plus movements.

As for the 85mm equivalent, all systems offer that.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224603\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Interesting, thanks for the above.

That puts me in bit of a quandry about the focal length. A view camera would be the ultimate for my kind of photography but I need to check the prices of the lenses. I had a look at the Rodenstock HR lenses last year at Focus on Imaging and have to say they looked absolutely amazing. How do the HR and non-HR lenses compare?
Logged

tho_mas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1799
Which MF system?
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2008, 11:10:07 am »

Quote
That puts me in bit of a quandry about the focal length. [a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224627\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
e.g. Phase One / Mamiya have a 28mm. Isn't that wide enough???
Too, you should not go for a 1.3 crop back if you worry too much about wide angle
« Last Edit: September 26, 2008, 11:12:43 am by tho_mas »
Logged

tho_mas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1799
Which MF system?
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2008, 11:11:51 am »

double
« Last Edit: September 26, 2008, 11:12:26 am by tho_mas »
Logged

flashfredrikson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 104
Which MF system?
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2008, 11:25:45 am »

Seems that you don't really need AF, and as you are on a budget, you might reconsider the 503cw. Used it is quite affordable, lots of lenses and stuff on the used market. Then get a refurb back of your choice.
I shoot a 503cw with a p45+ myself from time to time and I love it. Very versatile, with winder and 45° prism if weight doesn't matter, without winder and the wlf if it does. And the V backs also work on rz67 and any large format or alpa, or whatever you might need for your wide desires, with an adaptor. If you like to tether I would recommend phase one, if shooting speed, high iso and on cam display doesn't matter a lot to you, a refurb P45 might do the trick very well.


cheers,
martin
Logged

ChrisJR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
    • http://
Which MF system?
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2008, 11:27:51 am »

Quote
e.g. Phase One / Mamiya have a 28mm. Isn't that wide enough???
Too, you should not go for a 1.3 crop back if you worry too much about wide angle
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224637\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
It probably is wide enough. My only experience with MF is 6x6 at 40mm which wasn't quite wide enough for some of the photography I do. Perhaps the focal length equivalents are different with 645 than 6x6
Logged

Graham Mitchell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2281
Which MF system?
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2008, 11:35:29 am »

Quote
. Perhaps the focal length equivalents are different with 645 than 6x6
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224646\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Well, no. The horizontal FOV is the same (in landscape). The Rodenstock 23mm on the largest sensor you can get is the best and by far the widest option (though not the cheapest).
« Last Edit: September 26, 2008, 11:39:06 am by foto-z »
Logged

michele

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 230
Which MF system?
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2008, 11:41:16 am »

Perhaps you don't want to see the effect of the Rodenstock 23 on a P30 back...
A digital back it's a very specific tool, if you need it, it means that you really need it, and if you need it both for architecture both for products photography, it means that you are paid enough for either needs to buy a 36x48mm back with a sandwich camera with a good digital lens and a good digital medium format camera with a 120mm... I really don't agree with those which use digital back with an old medium format camera with analogic lenses; a digital back it's not like film or polaroid...so hasselblad V it's not a good one. If you don't have a big budget, maybe you can try to get the right platform with the right back for just one use, of corse the one you earn more money with... (sorry for my poor ugly english)

ChrisJR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
    • http://
Which MF system?
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2008, 11:58:16 am »

Quote
Perhaps you don't want to see the effect of the Rodenstock 23 on a P30 back...
A digital back it's a very specific tool, if you need it, it means that you really need it, and if you need it both for architecture both for products photography, it means that you are paid enough for either needs to buy a 36x48mm back with a sandwich camera with a good digital lens and a good digital medium format camera with a 120mm... I really don't agree with those which use digital back with an old medium format camera with analogic lenses; a digital back it's not like film or polaroid...so hasselblad V it's not a good one. If you don't have a big budget, maybe you can try to get the right platform with the right back for just one use, of corse the one you earn more money with... (sorry for my poor ugly english)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224652\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
My budget is a little tight at the moment although it could change by the time I'm ready to buy. I originally thought about getting a back to go with a 503CW but some reports have said it works great, some say it doesn't.

Next time I get a chance to go to London I'll try to book some appointments to check out some MFDB systems with their respective focal lengths and decide what to do.

Thanks.

ps. don't apologise about your English. My wife is Taiwanese and her written english really is UGLY.
Logged

michele

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 230
Which MF system?
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2008, 12:12:28 pm »

Quote
My budget is a little tight at the moment although it could change by the time I'm ready to buy. I originally thought about getting a back to go with a 503CW but some reports have said it works great, some say it doesn't.

Next time I get a chance to go to London I'll try to book some appointments to check out some MFDB systems with their respective focal lengths and decide what to do.

Thanks.

ps. don't apologise about your English. My wife is Taiwanese and her written english really is UGLY.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224660\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Eh eh  Many thanks...
Actually, we are in the same position... I'm going to buy a back but a have some limitation, of course the budget and the fact that I need lenses from a very wide angle to macro lens. I really love the Leaf sistem, but they don't have a 28mm that I need. I love very much the Phase backs and they do have a 28mm. But, and it's a big BUT Hasselblad now it's the cheapest... If PhaseOne sold its sistem at the same price of Hasselblad I'd go with Phase, I think they have better backs.
If you can, try your old hassy lenses with a back and then try a new digital lens...

thsinar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2066
    • http://www.sinarcameras.com
Which MF system?
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2008, 09:27:05 am »

Dear Chris,

you may check this new Sinar camera system, the Sinar Hy6 65, here:

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....showtopic=27565

and its prices here:

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....showtopic=27940

Am at your disposal for any further question you might have.

Best regards,
Thierry

Quote
A high flash sync speed would be ideal. I really miss shooting with a WLF and would probably shoot 90% of my photography in this way but having the option to switch between a WLF and angled finder would be perfect. The vast majority of my photography is now shot vertically but with occasional horizontal imagery.

I primarly use CS3 for editing RAW files but have started messing around with Lightoom and Capture 1 recently. Happy to give any editing programme a try.

Focal length... Equivalents to around 15mm and 85mm in 35mm format would be ideal.

Thanks
Thanks Chris.

I forgot to mention I'm based in the UK but I would be interested in a refurbished back perhaps. I've noticed the prices on your website for a refurb back are an awful lot cheaper than here in the UK.

Will be in touch soon.

Thanks
Chris.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224593\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Logged
Thierry Hagenauer
thasia_cn@yahoo.com

Snook

  • Guest
Which MF system?
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2008, 11:06:46 am »

Quote
Dear Chris,

you may check this new Sinar camera system, the Sinar Hy6 65, here:

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....showtopic=27565

and its prices here:

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....showtopic=27940

Am at your disposal for any further question you might have.

Best regards,
Thierry
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224896\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


I think most people here need to ask what are they going to print and where are they going to have it printed.
IF you publishing just Billboards and Magazine type stuff and not selling Gallery Prints at HUGE sizes, save your money and get a DSLR for now and wait and see what is going to come out of the these turbolent times...:+}
A lot of things are going to change here soon, and as others have mentoned.. wait and see what Nikon might do as well s they have spread rumors of a new Medium format equilvelent...
That will really rock up the MF community and probably lower the prices even more.
It's a good time to wait and see.
I would also suggest you go try out as much as you can. they all have their ups and downs from ISO to Sync speeds with flash and honestly think that leaf/sinar and Hassleblad have that all covered pretty well.
I am truly disspointed with Mamiya in the last few weeks. Showing up at Photokina with Sqwat!!!

Like their Phamiya was some big deal.. Same shit with a different name.. NOTHING new at all.
Atleast they could have come out with that promised new lens line...?
Snook

In any case you have the MF dealers at your hand as it is the consumers market. not the Manufacturers market , for once!
Logged

petermarrek

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 212
Which MF system?
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2008, 11:27:17 am »

I'm in the same predicament, would like to have the quality of the MF but until the have wide angles like the 12-24 and 14-24 I think that I'm forced to wait for the coming D3? nikon body to get any increase in resolution. If anyone knows of the equivalent to these lenses fo MF ( they don't have to be zooms ) please let me know.
Logged

marcwilson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 411
    • http://www.marcwilson.co.uk
Which MF system?
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2008, 02:07:04 pm »

petermarrek...see grahams post above concerning the 23mm lenses..

not sure what the to be released leica 24mm will be equivalent to with the sensor size.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2008, 02:17:26 pm by marcwilson »
Logged
www.marcwilson.co.uk [url=http://www.mar

marcwilson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 411
    • http://www.marcwilson.co.uk
Which MF system?
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2008, 02:16:10 pm »

Quote
Perhaps you don't want to see the effect of the Rodenstock 23 on a P30 back...
A digital back it's a very specific tool, if you need it, it means that you really need it, and if you need it both for architecture... needs to buy a 36x48mm back with a sandwich camera...
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224652\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

for architectural work, as far as I know there is no digital option that provided shifts with lenses as wide as that found using a mfdb and shift camera. So even if 35mm dslr is enough in terms of image quality, the 24mm shift lenses on those systems are often not wide enough for architectural work...so with digital capture, proper in camera perspective correction work can in some circumstances only be obtained with the medium format digital solution...

Marc
Logged
www.marcwilson.co.uk [url=http://www.mar

Sean Reginald Knight

  • Awaiting Authorisation
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 66
Which MF system?
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2008, 02:18:03 pm »

Quote
whilst of course 28mm is currently the widest medium format slr lens (18mm equiv I believe) you can go wider on shift cameras with a 23mm lens.

not sure what the to be released leica 24mm will be equivalent to with the sensor size.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224974\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

About 19mm focal length in 24mmx36mm sensor size terms.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up