Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: why a 1ds mark3?  (Read 19255 times)

uaiomex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1211
    • http://www.eduardocervantes.com
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2008, 08:16:03 pm »

Let's see: I buy one 1D3 and one 5D2 for a total of $ 6,700.00

I get all the pro features and built of the 1Ds3 with the 1D3
Then I get the 5D2 sensor out and put it inside the 1D3.

Ok, definetely some people have been ripped off at least $ 1,300.00  

Eduardo


Quote
Just adding further fuel to the fire... The 1D III which is 'practically the same' technology... Differences being UDMA on the 1Ds, Full frame and different prism/shutter mechanism can be had for practically half the price of the 1Ds. With the technology in the 5D2, even adding it on top of the 1DsIII makes it seem that we've been ripped off from the start really... Canon didn't NEED to make the price that high, but they did... Not unheard of in the industry, but really. I feel more hurt about that then anything else so far.

EDIT: Further... When I say I feel hurt... If say they'd honestly couldn't produce it for less then what they're asking for then fair enough... but it's clear now that the margin on the 1DsIII is massive... I have no doubt we'll be seeing some massive discounts for the 1DsIII potential customers soon.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=222765\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
« Last Edit: September 19, 2008, 08:18:14 pm by uaiomex »
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2008, 08:40:24 pm »

Quote
EDIT: Further... When I say I feel hurt... If say they'd honestly couldn't produce it for less then what they're asking for then fair enough... but it's clear now that the margin on the 1DsIII is massive... I have no doubt we'll be seeing some massive discounts for the 1DsIII potential customers soon.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=222765\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I think that any economist will tell you that pricing of a product is not just about working out what is a reasonable profit margin after deducting development and manufacturing costs, and retailers mark-ups, but it's also about getting whatever you think the market will pay.

We simply don't know what the actual costs are in bringing the 1Ds3 to market. For all I know (and probably all everyone else on this forum knows) Canon might not be making any net profit at all from the 1Ds3. Perhaps they are simply using it as a flagship model to enhance their reputation, accepting that all profits will be made on other cameras.

The situation might be along the lines....."This is what we can do. It's the best 35mm DSLR we can make. If we charge you 8 grand, we break even. If we charge you less, we lose money. If we charge you more, we lose money because sales will be less and some of you will opt for an MFDB system."
Logged

David Anderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
    • http://www.twigwater.com
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2008, 11:42:11 pm »

Dropped one of my DsIII's off my shoulder onto cement the other day and it's fine and the 35 1.4 needed a little tweek in the lens mount.

I had both back in 24 hours.

What's that worth ?

hard to say, but if nothing else the 1 series are tough..

The thing about the new 5 that has me most curious is the high ISO quality, if it's a lot better than the III's I might get one for low light stuff.
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2008, 02:07:05 am »

Quote
Dropped one of my DsIII's off my shoulder onto cement the other day and it's fine and the 35 1.4 needed a little tweek in the lens mount.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=222812\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

That's worth a lot. I'm usually very careful handling cameras, but on one occasion I dropped my Sigma 15-30 on a rock-strewn rainforest floor from waist height and watched with dismay as it clattered down a slope before coming to rest about 10 metres away.

I couldn't chase after it because I was in the process of changing lenses, holding a lens in one hand and camera body in the other.

I just assumed the lens would be a write-off. As I walked down the slope to retrieve it, I was thinking, 'there's goes a $1,000, and no more wide-angle shots for me on this trip'.
 
Was I surprised to find that the lens seemed completely undamaged, apart from a few scuff marks on the casing. I'm still using it years after that accident.

When accidents like that happen, it's not just the cost of repair or the replacement cost of the item that's significant, but the inconvenience, time wasted and other related costs.
Logged

David Anderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
    • http://www.twigwater.com
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #24 on: September 20, 2008, 08:01:33 am »

I also got caught out in the rain while shoting a fishing story up a remote valley and my DsIII and 16-35 got totally soaked over a long period and is to this day both are fine.
On the other hand a friend of mine got stuck in quicksand on a New Zealand river while we were fishing (true story  ) and his 5D got half dunked.

It lasted another couple weeks with some weird bugs and then was replaced under insurance, he had trouble shooting the rest of the trip.

Again, hard to put a price on this stuff, but if a 1DsIII is 2 and half times the price of a new 5D it might go some way towards peace of mind for the money saved..
Logged

Snook

  • Guest
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #25 on: September 22, 2008, 12:48:22 pm »

Quote
1 question and 1 comment..
question: the 5d MK II is going to have the digic 4 processor vs a digic 3 in the 1dsmkIII, should this make any difference in actual image quality, or is that just the speed the image is written...?

comment: obviously for the people who need the advantages of the 1dsMkIII the camera will be there, but i dont feel like 1/250th of a flash sync vs 1/200th is that big of a deal, thats 1/3 of a stop. i personally use pocket wizards to fire my strobes, [profoto] and you cant have those sync on ANY canon faster then 200, and there is NO way im gonna hard sync to my packs.. So for someone that shoots only portraits, a weather proof body dosent really interest me in the difference in price as if its raining/snowing outside, i doubt my subjects are gonna be down for their portrait to be made in those conditions..  nor do i need any fancy auto focusing, but thats for my specific style of shooting and im sure if you're shooting wildlife or kids running around like chickens with their heads cut off,its a whole different story..

for me personally i just need a better file then what the current 5D has to offer, i've been using the markIIIds for the past 2 months on all of my shoots and the files are perfect for what i need, so if i can get the same file quality at more then 1/2 the price, this is tempting...

to play devils advocate, as a professional editorial photographer such as myself, you can bill more for the 1dsmkIII camera, at $500/shoot it should only take 2, possibly 3 months to pay off, and then after that, its making you more money then the rental fee for the 5dmkII... decisions decisions..

update: thats battery grip has no option to be bought without the wifi in it, so that'll probably cost another 800-1k, sorta lame they arent going to offer a grip with the fancy wifi..
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=222634\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


I think your wrong in your statement as I use a 1DsMII at 250/th with profoto and pocket wizards and never have had a problem... get the Multi Max's you will be able to shoot at higher sync.
I even shoot at 320/th sometimes and siim the sides where the black starts coming in..
Snook
Logged

a_krause

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #26 on: September 22, 2008, 01:21:00 pm »

Quote
I think your wrong in your statement as I use a 1DsMII at 250/th with profoto and pocket wizards and never have had a problem... get the Multi Max's you will be able to shoot at higher sync.
I even shoot at 320/th sometimes and siim the sides where the black starts coming in..
Snook
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=223309\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

i dont think wrong is the correct wording, but thats getting into semantics. yeah you can get a mutli max for $100 more then a transceiver, and you can push your sync speed to 320th but thats still only 1/3 of a stop faster. with that same theory you can put the mutli max on said 5dmkII and probably get it up to 250th of a sec. In my experience of shooting with an RZ that syncs at 400th [2/3s stops faster then 250th] the possibility of getting motion blur with strobe in bright daylight is still possible, but i am also OK with that. like i said in the original post, the people that'll need the mark III for the few intrinsic qualities it has over the 5dmkII im sure the price jump would totally be worth it, for someone just needs a richer file then what the current 5d has to offer but is OK with the 5d's functionalities, i think its a no brainer.

i literally bought the mkIII 5 days before the 5dmkII came out, was shooting my 2nd assignment with it the day the 5dmkII was announced, i called the place where i got it, and they let me return it full refund and are just put it in their rental dept. with that said, i think the mkIII is an amazing camera. and if the 5dmkII was say 18 mexapixels, and not 21, i would have kept the mkIII
« Last Edit: September 22, 2008, 01:28:18 pm by a_krause »
Logged

Ken R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 849
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #27 on: September 24, 2008, 01:14:35 pm »

Canon SHOULD reduce the 1Ds mk3 price to around $5500...
Logged

yoni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 141
    • http://www.lighttrace.com
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #28 on: September 24, 2008, 08:04:55 pm »

Quote
Canon SHOULD reduce the 1Ds mk3 price to around $5500...
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224001\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

That now appears to be the going price in the used market for a good copy with an occasional dip below this price.  I suspect a drop to around $4500, my price point for purchase,  can be expected once 5d2 is out.
Logged

Josh-H

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2079
    • Wild Nature Photo Travel
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #29 on: September 24, 2008, 08:29:00 pm »

Quote
Canon SHOULD reduce the 1Ds mk3 price to around $5500...
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=224001\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I actually don't think they should or will [at least in the short term].

Mostly because its a flagship product - their statement piece as it were, that includes an already documented list of items not on the 5DMKII. Yes, the 5DMKII shoots video, but thats an aside and really not a deal breaker for someone considering a MK3 purchase.

Buying a flaship product always comes at a premium, wether its a car, computer [ala mac pro], watch, whatever. You always pay significantly more for a flagship model. And you don't always get that extra cost in value add.

Thats just life.

But for those who need or want the offerings included in the 1DSMK3 its there at its flagship price.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2008, 08:38:48 pm by Josh-H »
Logged
Wild Nature Photo Travel

ChrisJR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
    • http://
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #30 on: September 25, 2008, 06:54:48 am »

Quote
Dropped one of my DsIII's off my shoulder onto cement the other day and it's fine and the 35 1.4 needed a little tweek in the lens mount.

I had both back in 24 hours.

What's that worth ?

hard to say, but if nothing else the 1 series are tough..

The thing about the new 5 that has me most curious is the high ISO quality, if it's a lot better than the III's I might get one for low light stuff.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=222812\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
The 5d mk2 sounds like an ideal immediate solution for my current photographic needs but the one thing that puts me off buying one is how tough is it?

My 1d mk3 has been dropped twice. First time I dropped it and it just bounced, no problems at all. Second time my wife dropped it from nearly 2 metres high and again the body bounced, no problems at all. Killed the 24-105 lens I had attached though, it fell apart and will no longer autofocus after screwing it back together.

If I was sure the 5d mk2 is wife-proof I'd probably get one.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2008, 06:58:50 am by radders2007 »
Logged

erick.boileau

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 468
    • http://
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #31 on: September 25, 2008, 07:31:06 am »

I think nothing in the world is wife-proof
Logged

jjj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4728
    • http://www.futtfuttfuttphotography.com
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #32 on: September 25, 2008, 07:50:29 am »

Quote
I also got caught out in the rain while shoting a fishing story up a remote valley and my DsIII and 16-35 got totally soaked over a long period and is to this day both are fine.
On the other hand a friend of mine got stuck in quicksand on a New Zealand river while we were fishing (true story  ) and his 5D got half dunked.

It lasted another couple weeks with some weird bugs and then was replaced under insurance, he had trouble shooting the rest of the trip.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=222853\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
A more relevant comparison would have been if your mate had had problems after using in rain when you didn't. The 1Ds may well have been just glitchy if half dunked as well.
Why not test this? If it's as good as you say half dunk it in quicksand/water and you'll have no problems.  
Logged
Tradition is the Backbone of the Spinele

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #33 on: September 25, 2008, 08:35:06 pm »

As regards dropping camera equipment on hard surfaces, I should add although I'm still using my Sigma 15-30 several years later, after dropping it in the rainforest whilst changing lenses, I had to send the lens in for repair recently because the diaphragm got stuck wide open, resulting in serious everexposure at F16. This was a fault which developed gradually. The first indication that something was wrong became apparent when auto-bracketing exposures in TV mode. Mysteriously, all shots would have equal exposure at different apertures.

The point I'm making is, although a camera might appear to be functioning well immediately after an accident, the less robust camera might be weakened in such a way that a fault appears some time later, perhaps years later, that is directly related to that accident.

One might dunk both the 5D2 and 1Ds3 in water for the same period of time and find that both cameras appear to work perfectly well afterwards. However, it might be the case that the 5D2 lets in a tiny amount of water around the shutter button (for example) that has no immediate effect on the camera's performance, but causes some slight corrosion before it dries. That weakened component, due to corrosion, might malfunction years down the track, or perhaps only months later.
Logged

JDClements

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 312
    • http://www.jdanielclements.com
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #34 on: September 28, 2008, 09:07:59 pm »

"Dropping the camera stories" don't really prove anything about the durability of the camera (anecdotal and too many variables). I dropped a *Rebel XTi* out of a sling pack (higher than waist high on a 6'2" body) and it hit a solid slate floor. No problem, other than a broken filter.

That's one tough camera!
Logged

JDClements

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 312
    • http://www.jdanielclements.com
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #35 on: September 28, 2008, 09:10:08 pm »

Quote
The point I'm making is, although a camera might appear to be functioning well immediately after an accident, the less robust camera might be weakened in such a way that a fault appears some time later, perhaps years later, that is directly related to that accident.

So true. And by the time the problem shows up, a person will probably have no connection left to the earlier accident.
Logged

lisa_r

  • Guest
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #36 on: October 03, 2008, 07:42:23 pm »

In terms of the practical differences betewen the chips in the 1Ds3 & 5D2:
It has been said by two Canon officials (chuck westfall and some other dude in the dpr interview that the 5D2 chip will be superior in that it will have 2-4 stops better noise characteriistics, and it will also have better D.R.

So, I have put a few 5D2 bodies on order ;-)
Logged

BruceHouston

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 308
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #37 on: October 03, 2008, 08:00:47 pm »

Quote from: Ray
I think that any economist will tell you that pricing of a product is not just about working out what is a reasonable profit margin after deducting development and manufacturing costs, and retailers mark-ups, but it's also about getting whatever you think the market will pay.

We simply don't know what the actual costs are in bringing the 1Ds3 to market. For all I know (and probably all everyone else on this forum knows) Canon might not be making any net profit at all from the 1Ds3. Perhaps they are simply using it as a flagship model to enhance their reputation, accepting that all profits will be made on other cameras.

The situation might be along the lines....."This is what we can do. It's the best 35mm DSLR we can make. If we charge you 8 grand, we break even. If we charge you less, we lose money. If we charge you more, we lose money because sales will be less and some of you will opt for an MFDB system."

Correct.

The economist will also say that P&L may cross product lines.  That is, R&D dollars may be initially sunk into the flagship product line and the resulting technology may later be rolled down to lower-cost product lines.  The flagship product line may have to carry the weight of the R&D expenditures initially because it is only those sales paying for the R&D prior to rolling it down in subsequent model years.  The managers must account for P&L on quarterly and yearly reporting cycles.  This may be one reason for Nikon's introducing its flagship D3 at a lower cost and then rolling most of the technology down to the D700 rather quickly.

The R&D must be recovered somewhere, at some time.  Pay me now or pay me later.

Bruce
Logged

SeanFS

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 114
    • http://www.seanshadbolt.co.nz
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #38 on: October 03, 2008, 11:17:46 pm »

Quote from: lisa_r
In terms of the practical differences betewen the chips in the 1Ds3 & 5D2:
It has been said by two Canon officials (chuck westfall and some other dude in the dpr interview that the 5D2 chip will be superior in that it will have 2-4 stops better noise characteriistics, and it will also have better D.R.

So, I have put a few 5D2 bodies on order ;-)

On that note , I kept my 1ds2 as I 'm still struggling to see huge differences between it and the mk 3 up to 800asa, beyond there yes the files are an improvement. A little more resolution, only with the best lenses, a little more colour depth but a fraction less DR straight out of the camera( lower iso's), much bigger files that slow up my work flow on some jobs and I am still learning all the features on it six months later - I just couldn't find the switch card setting in the function button the other day, slightly distracted( how many button pushes is that again?) as I was hanging out of a helicopter at  1000 feet. Had to switch back to the mk2. In he studio the supremely annoying quirk of the Mk3 is not having all those 45 focus points available when trying to focus on a particular part of the image  - something you could take for granted with the mk 2, but for sports and the like I bet the focussing is fabuous.
 I think Canon pushed the boat out with the Mk2 and it was a hard act to follow ( I haven't owned the 5d as I need pro quality bodies though its a great camera ). I'm generally  pleased with it even if it sounds like I'm not - and I made so much money with the mk2 it was really a no brainer to buy the mk 3, but a MF alternative it isn't ( yet) - the colour and noise characteristics aren't quite there yet ( although the colour is very, very close).
Digic 4 will have to be some thing else again to create much of a gulf from either of these cameras.
One thing is for certain though , the movie world is getting quietly excited about the possibilities of the 5D2 35mm size high quality video imaging? Cnaon will sell a truckload on that basis alone
Logged

eronald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6642
    • My gallery on Instagram
why a 1ds mark3?
« Reply #39 on: October 09, 2008, 09:30:39 am »

Quote from: radders2007
The 5d mk2 sounds like an ideal immediate solution for my current photographic needs but the one thing that puts me off buying one is how tough is it?

My 1d mk3 has been dropped twice. First time I dropped it and it just bounced, no problems at all. Second time my wife dropped it from nearly 2 metres high and again the body bounced, no problems at all. Killed the 24-105 lens I had attached though, it fell apart and will no longer autofocus after screwing it back together.

If I was sure the 5d mk2 is wife-proof I'd probably get one.

Yeah, I dropped my 1Ds2 once (bag handles broke), it just bounced. Literally. Went on working, no issues.
On the other hand, I think the used 5DMk1 will soon drop to $1 at which point it'll be a travel point and shoot

Edmund
Logged
If you appreciate my blog posts help me by following on https://instagram.com/edmundronald
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up