Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Canon 200 F2 IS L  (Read 9878 times)

jani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1620
    • yet
Canon 200 F2 IS L
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2008, 06:39:06 PM »

Quote from: dchew
Much of the harshness may be from the very light, blown out background.  Panopeeper's background examples are light but they still have color, so they aren't nearly as challenging.
Yes, the problem is with the composition, specifically the (poor) choice of background. IMO, this is primarily visible in the first picture.

How we choose to compose our images have significant effect on how a lens appears to perform.
Logged
Jan

eronald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5228
Canon 200 F2 IS L
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2008, 07:32:04 PM »

Hehe, here is what I used my 200/1.8 for. Two different shows, obviously, left is Dior (look for the dice).


edmund
Logged

David Anderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 684
    • http://www.twigwater.com
Canon 200 F2 IS L
« Reply #22 on: October 05, 2008, 11:02:49 PM »

Quote from: jani
Yes, the problem is with the composition, specifically the (poor) choice of background. IMO, this is primarily visible in the first picture.

Bloody kids, they can't even choose a background !    


Logged
www.twigwater.com My fly fishing blog.

David Anderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 684
    • http://www.twigwater.com
Canon 200 F2 IS L
« Reply #23 on: October 05, 2008, 11:04:27 PM »

Quote from: eronald
Hehe, here is what I used my 200/1.8 for. Two different shows, obviously, left is Dior (look for the dice).
 )


Logged
www.twigwater.com My fly fishing blog.

jani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1620
    • yet
Canon 200 F2 IS L
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2008, 04:03:59 AM »

Quote from: David Anderson
Bloody kids, they can't even choose a background !  
I stand corrected, those kids are very promising photographers.  
Logged
Jan
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up