After using parents' Retina Reflex, friend's Exacta and a borrowed Leica M-4, I finally bought the original Olympus Om-1 in 1973. Went on to add the orginal OM-2. Loved its incredible "painting with light" low-light abilities, especially with compact Zuiko lenses like the 24f2. I even started collecting Pen FT/Fv kit. Eventually bought the OM4T and its 280 flash about 19989, which I made the mistake of selling 8 years later, in order to get the autofocus Nikon F70, because my eyes were no longer as sharp. All the automation/matrix metering, and great flash control was great for sharp, well-meterd, salable instructional images, especially with the 24-120 lens. But the need for flash to compensate for slowness of the non-megabuck lenses also made for predictable images. Traded F70 for the smaller, more ergonomic F-80 about 2001. Easier to use, but even less inspiring.
Got a Olympus C5050Z for underwater photography. It and the housing were cheaper than a housing for the F80 would have been, and I wanted to try digital.
I was absolutely blown away by the quality of the images, especially in such areas as colour gradation and saturation in high-contrast situations (sunsets, etc) and low light situations.
In Dec. 2004, I bought an Olmpus E-1 outfit after many side-by-side comparisons the Nikon D70 and Canon 20D. Was heading for the rainforest in Dominica, and liked the solidity and weather sealing, relative compactness of the whole (14-54mmf 2.8, 50mmf2 macro, 50-200mmf2.8 zoom lens) outfit. Put *tool* usability before latest features. Rarely regret that. Recently added the 11-22mm f2.8(fantastic lens) and and E500 body (so, so) Still have two Om 1's, an OM 2 and the F80, and the 5050 and a Canon S70 and their housings for underwater, but rarely use the film cameras.
Really hope that there'll be an E-1 successor!
erichK
saskatoon, canada