Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Canon 28mm f2.8  (Read 2750 times)

griff19690

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Canon 28mm f2.8
« on: July 11, 2008, 06:33:49 pm »

I am looking at buying a standard prime on a very tight budget.  Has anyone ever used a Canon 28mm 2.8?  Is it any good?
Logged

semillerimages

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • http://www.semillerimages.com
Canon 28mm f2.8
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2008, 01:16:51 pm »

It is amazingly good. Wide open, it vignettes quite a lot, but this lens draws it's images oh so well. Focuses kind of slow and loud, but sharp sharp... can't be beat for the price.
I will use it in place of my 17-40L or 24-70L at 28mm any day of the week.

*steve

F2.8 image left, f8 image right - shot yesterday. Full view and crops.

Quote
I am looking at buying a standard prime on a very tight budget.  Has anyone ever used a Canon 28mm 2.8?  Is it any good?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=207427\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
« Last Edit: July 12, 2008, 01:17:32 pm by semillerimages »
Logged
semillerimages.com

griff19690

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Canon 28mm f2.8
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2008, 02:30:58 pm »

Thanks.  Are you using a digital SLR?  I had assumed vignetting would have been less of a problem with an aps-c sensor.
Logged

mahleu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 585
    • 500px
Canon 28mm f2.8
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2008, 02:35:16 pm »

I went for a used 28mm f1.8, but I needed speed so that was my primary concern. I'm very happy with it on a crop body.
Logged
________________________________________

Mike W

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
Canon 28mm f2.8
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2008, 03:07:32 pm »

it's not bad, much better than the 24mm 1.4 L. So it's a bargain.
Logged

semillerimages

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163
    • http://www.semillerimages.com
Canon 28mm f2.8
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2008, 03:16:17 pm »

These were shot on my 1dsmark2 and actually for my aesthetic, I like the vignette

*steve

Quote
It is amazingly good. Wide open, it vignettes quite a lot, but this lens draws it's images oh so well. Focuses kind of slow and loud, but sharp sharp... can't be beat for the price.
I will use it in place of my 17-40L or 24-70L at 28mm any day of the week.

*steve

F2.8 image left, f8 image right - shot yesterday. Full view and crops.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=207644\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
« Last Edit: July 12, 2008, 03:17:22 pm by semillerimages »
Logged
semillerimages.com

Ken Bennett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1797
    • http://www.kenbennettphoto.com
Canon 28mm f2.8
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2008, 04:07:32 pm »

I like the vignette a lot. I almost always add some vignette in my raw processing, especially for portraits and location work. It helps frame the photo and place visual emphasis on the subject. (Back in the last millennium we used to do something called "burning the corners." Ah, the memories.)

For landscapes and stitching, of course, the vignetting is a pain in the neck. But it's usually removable in processing, and you won't see it at f/8 or f/11 anyway.

BTW I am a big fan of the 24/1.4, but only when shot wide open or close to it. If you're shooting at f/8, there's no reason to carry it or spend all that money. I also like the 28/1.8, with the same proviso.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2008, 04:08:06 pm by k bennett »
Logged
Equipment: a camera and some lenses. https://www.instagram.com/wakeforestphoto/
Pages: [1]   Go Up