afi 5 with 50 schnieder

[tomholland]

recent portraits with my new afi 5 [attachment=6882:attachment][attachment=6883:attachment]

[eronald]

recent portraits with my new afi 5 [attachment=6882:attachment][attachment=6883:attachment]
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=199419\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Larger ?

I mean the image setup and lighting is very nice, but at this size one cannot see any difference between these images and what you could have done with a cellphone.

Edmund

[Gigi]

Larger ?

I mean the image setup and lighting is very nice, but at this size one cannot see any difference between these images and what you could have done with a cellphone.

Edmund
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=199423\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Edmund -
You are right, but how about a softer touch....?

Geoff

[eronald]

Edmund -
You are right, but how about a softer touch....?

Geoff
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=199425\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Ok, let's restate the case:

 These atmospheric images demonstrate the considerable talent of the photographer at sculpting a space, putting up lighting, and posing the model. However, the displayed web-sized photos offer few clues about the equipment used for capture, indeed one would conjecture that a photographer with such artistic abilities could market work created with any commercially available imaging device including a cellphone.



Edmund

[rljones]

Something like "Please show us a larger image or 100% views." would have been a courteous request. Instead, we are treated to a snotty remark followed by a sarcastic one. It is sad that brief and polite sentences cannot be the norm.

[RobertJ]

Well, I never expect anyone to just post a full file for someone to "steal" off of an internet forum, but a 100 percent crop to demonstrate some nice image quality would be fun.

Otherwise, congrats, and enjoy your new camera system!

[ddk]

Ok, let's restate the case:

 These atmospheric images demonstrate the considerable talent of the photographer at sculpting a space, putting up lighting, and posing the model. However, the displayed web-sized photos offer few clues about the equipment used for capture, indeed one would conjecture that a photographer with such artistic abilities could market work created with any commercially available imaging device including a cellphone.



Edmund
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=199429\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Interesting how differently people react to something. Personally I found your original post humorous and light, nothing offensive about it. Even this sarcastic one is funny! Its both amazing and encouraging that such a wide variety of people with distinctly different backgrounds and sensibilities come together in these forums and actually share and get along.

david

[JTFOTO]

GEAT SHOTS!!!

Gotta love the schneider lenses.  There is a certain something out the schneider glass that i miss from the 6008 that i see here

[paulmoorestudio]

Larger ?

I mean the image setup and lighting is very nice, but at this size one cannot see any difference between these images and what you could have done with a cellphone.

Edmund
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=199423\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I know of no cellphone with a flash synch..but I don't keep up to date with small format.. and besides is it all about the pixel count? Is he posting just to compare sharpness/resolution.. I don't think that was the intent.  Nice to see the work from my point of view.. regardless of size.. too bad  some have a one track mind.