Just a minor clarification to Michael's comments on Sean Reid's article on the NEC 2490.
Michael indicated that both Sean and Karl Lang believe that the NEC 2490 may be the best LCD monitor yet for photographers.
That's not how I read Sean's review. I think he was careful to qualify both his and Karl's enthusiasm for the 2490 as being the best "for the money," which is quite different.
In reading other posts, it appears that Karl has not yet been able to test the Eizo's so we don't know how they compare. They may be better or they may not.