Dustbak - I'll try some of your values. Coming up with those S-curves is not my speciality. The correct adjustment point(s) are somewhere along the line and then +/- at that point. Clicking on the curve is so crude, it's like carpet bombing when a precision munition is needed.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=181485\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
If you have an hour you might want to try my curves technique it got me close enough. They are not s curves but just one or 2 points on a "banana" curve. It is easy to click on the center point 127, 127 then type the values into the input and output windows very precise. Worth an hours time if it solves your problem?
Marc
I found the differences when looking at a color chart were daunting but in general the Canon had a bit too much magenta and the Phase a bit too much green and the above changes made outdoor landscape files look a lot closer, much closer than the 2 minor adjustments would leave you to believe.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=181503\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
[/quote]
The upside is (depnding on the raw processor) the Phase backs are more color sensitive than the Canons, which in my eyes seems more global in color.
In other words the Phase sees ambient color more than the Canons, which though sometimes very pleasing in open shade, are a little color dumb.
I routinely shoot multiple cameras per job, Phase and Leica, Canon and Phase etc. etc. and though you can get close I've found none exactly match, or for that matter probably should.
Given all of this, if you want to get closer to the Canon look with the Phase, (at least with my p30 and P21 plus') I use V4 for final development or Raw Developer.
For slight small changes I use the color editor, but that is usually on set to show and art dirctor the look, or to just clean up white backgrounds.
Try some different processors and I think you will get much closer.
JR