Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008  (Read 4727 times)

Tony Beach

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 452
    • http://imageevent.com/tonybeach/twelveimages
Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
« on: February 17, 2008, 05:03:28 pm »

Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2008, 06:41:02 pm »

Quote

[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=175519\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
For me, it would have been better if you'd walked a few yards towards the peak on the right, so the whole bridge came into view. It looks as if there's a lovely light on the centre part, but it's not properly visible.

I see a rather uninteresting grassy knoll, irritatingly obscuring an attractive bridge.

IMHO, of course.

Jeremy
« Last Edit: February 17, 2008, 06:41:42 pm by kikashi »
Logged

berbig

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
    • http://www.bigtonfoto.no/
Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2008, 10:05:51 am »

Interesting picture. I have seen many pictures of this bridge, but never one that shows the terrain this way. May be I have to visit one day?
I really like the chosen angle because I can in my mind "walk" the hills towards the bridge.

Bernt
Logged
Bernt Bigton
Norway www.bigtonfoto.no

popnfresh

  • Guest
Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2008, 06:46:20 pm »

Nice photo of the Marin headlands. What's the bridge doing there?  
Logged

hs0zfe

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 66
Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2008, 11:47:13 am »

Have you changed position (walked up to the peak)? Maybe a tele shot towards the town might have been interesting, too?

You certainly found an unusual view. Half of the photo is showing a grass hill Quite interesting, if this was not the only photo of the bridge.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up