One has to ask, who really needs more than 39mp? Who "needs" 60mp because 39mp just doesn't cut it? [a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172744\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Aditionally one must consider - who can actually shoot 60mp of actual resolution
-no one handheld at below 500/s for sure
one will just be able to see shake misfocussing and lense problems better
The MF makers need to skip resolution worries and get thier usability up
I love my D3 - the screen - the live view - the in camera jpgs, the ISO, the 28 shift lens, the 1.4 lenses
The fact that I have almost had to stop carrying lights on simple assigments !
The last thing I worry about with my Blad and 22mp is the resolution
The blad does of course have its place - the look - the synch speed
There has been minimal comment on Mark Tucker binning his MF kit (see the FS section) - surely a year ago this would have occupied millions of pixels of chatter
S