Topic: 35mm Lenses: Cambo Wide DS vs Medium Format (Read 10533 times)

clawery · « **on:** February 04, 2008, 12:13:19 pm »

Alright, so we are a bit masochistic here at Capture Integration, but we are going to post another comparison. This test will show you a P45+ on a Cambo Wide DS vs other medium format systems.

http://www.captureintegration.com/tests/lens-samples/

Chris Lawery
Title, Capture Integration
Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer of the Year

877-217-9870 | National
404-234-5195 | Cell
Sign up for our Newsletter | Read Our Latest Newsletter

amsp · « **Reply #1 on:** February 04, 2008, 12:16:20 pm »

"error 404" when you click the cwds pics.

clawery · « **Reply #2 on:** February 04, 2008, 12:32:10 pm »

I'll have it checked out and updated ASAP. Sorry for the problems.

Chris Lawery
Title, Capture Integration
Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer of the Year

877-217-9870 | National
404-234-5195 | Cell
Sign up for our Newsletter | Read Our Latest Newsletter

rainer_v · « **Reply #3 on:** February 04, 2008, 01:01:13 pm »

Quote

I'll have it checked out and updated ASAP. Sorry for the problems.

Chris Lawery
Title, Capture Integration
Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer of the Year

877-217-9870 | National
404-234-5195 | Cell
Sign up for our Newsletter | Read Our Latest Newsletter
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172250\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

which lenses did you use? schneider? rodenstock ? mamiya ? contax ? H ?

Mort54 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 04, 2008, 02:19:29 pm »

Quote

Alright, so we are a bit masochistic here at Capture Integration, but we are going to post another comparison.

Thanks Chris for taking the time to do this. It's great to see these comparisons - it gets us away from the purely subjective opinions.

Now, if the MF camera isn't a Mamiya 645, then it sure would be nice if you could add a Mamiya to the comparison :-) Also (you knew there would have to be an "also"), it sure would be nice to see the same shots with a 35mm Rodenstock HR lens on an Alpa kit (I believe you guys sell Alpa's).

Thanks again.

clawery · « **Reply #5 on:** February 04, 2008, 02:39:36 pm »

Quote

Thanks Chris for taking the time to do this. It's great to see these comparisons - it gets us away from the purely subjective opinions.

Now, if the MF camera isn't a Mamiya 645, then it sure would be nice if you could add a Mamiya to the comparison :-) Also (you knew there would have to be an "also"), it sure would be nice to see the same shots with a 35mm Rodenstock HR lens on an Alpa kit (I believe you guys sell Alpa's).

Thanks again.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

We are an Alpa dealer and I'll have to see if can add it to the mix in our next test.

Chris Lawery
Title, Capture Integration
[a href=\"http://www.captureintegration.com]Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer of the Year[/url]

877-217-9870 | National
404-234-5195 | Cell
Sign up for our Newsletter | Read Our Latest Newsletter

MarkKay · « **Reply #6 on:** February 04, 2008, 05:26:59 pm »

Chris. I do not believe there is going to be too much issue if you list which MF camera/lenses you used for the study. I think most people have seen some data suggesting that the digital/digitar lenses give more resolving power with the higher end digital backs.

Quote

Alright, so we are a bit masochistic here at Capture Integration, but we are going to post another comparison. This test will show you a P45+ on a Cambo Wide DS vs other medium format systems.
http://www.captureintegration.com/tests/lens-samples/

Chris Lawery
Title, Capture Integration
Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer of the Year

877-217-9870 | National
404-234-5195 | Cell
Sign up for our Newsletter | Read Our Latest Newsletter
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172238\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Graham Mitchell · « **Reply #7 on:** February 05, 2008, 02:27:10 am »

I compared the right side window at f8 and it wasn't even a close race. The Digitar was better in every way and seems to be taking full advantage of the P45.

In fact I would bet that a P25 plus Digitar would give a better image quality than this MF camera and P45 combination.

Just another reminder that it's not all about megapixels

stefan marquardt · « **Reply #8 on:** February 05, 2008, 02:35:15 am »

chris, would you be so kind as to let me know which slr 35mm lens you used?
hasselblad? and was it (software-) distortion corrected?
(I am asking because I am in the market for one)

thanks stefan

rainer_v · « **Reply #9 on:** February 05, 2008, 03:27:19 am »

Quote

I compared the right side window at f8 and it wasn't even a close race. The Digitar was better in every way and seems to be taking full advantage of the P45.

In fact I would bet that a P25 plus Digitar would give a better image quality than this MF camera and P45 combination.

Just another reminder that it's not all about megapixels

[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172405\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

yes but the whole zones downside including the lower left and right corner are better
from the "normal" 35mm, including the center of the image. strange.

MarkKay · « **Reply #10 on:** February 05, 2008, 04:22:08 am »

I bet it is the mamiya.. only because of the Mamiya-Phase relationship

Quote

chris, would you be so kind as to let me know which slr 35mm lens you used?
hasselblad? and was it (software-) distortion corrected?
(I am asking because I am in the market for one)

thanks stefan
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172406\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

stefan marquardt · « **Reply #11 on:** February 05, 2008, 06:20:12 am »

Quote

I bet it is the mamiya.. only because of the Mamiya-Phase relationship
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172418\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

if it´s the mamiya, then it doesn´t show the same amount (of barrel) distortion my old, manual 35mm has. and edge sharpness seems to be better than my one. (which seem to coincide with what somebody from mamiya germany told me last week: that - even thought the lenscalculations are the same from the old 35mm - they probably use a newer kind of glass for the af 35mm. or perhaps I just have a bad sample lens.)

looking at the pic again, the lack of distortion and of (stronger) CA would indicate to me that it´s the - perhaps software-corrected - 35mm hasselblad lens.

stefan

eronald · « **Reply #12 on:** February 05, 2008, 06:37:02 am »

Anyone using wide-angle solutions should investigate flare issues carefully. I've had people email me for profiles, when in fact careful evaluation of their files showed they had serious flare problems rather than defective colorimetry. One should not confuse flare and reduced contrast with bad resolution.

Edmund

Quote

if it´s the mamiya (what I thought too) then it doesn´t show the same amount (of barrel) distortion my old, manual 35mm has. and edge sharpness seems to be better than my one. which seem to coincide with what somebody from mamiya germany told me last week: that - even thought the lenscalculations are the same from the old 35mm - they probably use a newer kind of glass for the af 35mm. or perhaps I just have a bad sample lens.

stefan
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172426\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Jack Varney · « **Reply #13 on:** February 06, 2008, 09:52:30 pm »

Quote

chris, would you be so kind as to let me know which slr 35mm lens you used?
hasselblad? and was it (software-) distortion corrected?
(I am asking because I am in the market for one)

thanks stefan
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172406\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

From the referenced Capture Integration web page -

"CWDS lens was a Schneider lens: APO Digitar f5.6 35mm XL-102deg MC "

stefan marquardt · « **Reply #14 on:** February 07, 2008, 02:41:25 am »

Quote

From the referenced Capture Integration web page -

"CWDS lens was a Schneider lens: APO Digitar f5.6 35mm XL-102deg MC "
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=172879\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

we are wondering about the other lens, not the one on the cambo.

stefan

jing q · « **Reply #15 on:** February 07, 2008, 04:41:30 am »

has it been other people's experience that the edges on the rodenstock and schneider lenses tend to be less sharp than the normal medium format lenses
I'm using a rodenstock 45mm digitar and it gets abit soft on the edges compared. the center area is sharper than my mamiya 45mm however

vgogolak · « **Reply #16 on:** February 08, 2008, 01:34:56 am »

Same with 35mm digitar vs Contax 35mm;
digitar sharper in center
Contax a bit sharper at edge

however, both fall off
the Digitar center though cant be beat on the alpa with P45+

Regards
Victor

vgogolak · « **Reply #17 on:** February 08, 2008, 01:42:28 am »

BTW, the reluctance to name the 35mm lens is just suspicious; it leaves open the test to question;
if the M then of course, reluctant to hit a current 'for sale system'
if the C then might have shown it, discontinued, no?
if other then why?

the MF 35mm lenses are not the same. If you cant name it, then all we know is the Digitar is better than ONE of them , in the center.

Victor

RobertJ · « **Reply #18 on:** February 15, 2008, 09:31:07 pm »

Aren't the Rodenstock HR lenses far, far better than the Rodenstock Digital Sironar and Schneider digitar lenses?

At least that's what I've seen so far. If I had a P45+, I know what lenses I would use...

adammork · « **Reply #19 on:** February 16, 2008, 06:44:15 am »

Quote

Aren't the Rodenstock HR lenses far, far better than the Rodenstock Digital Sironar and Schneider digitar lenses?

At least that's what I've seen so far. If I had a P45+, I know what lenses I would use...
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

No, not to my findings - I tested both Rodenstock HR lenses and Schneider Apo-Digitars and my bag is now full of Schneider's, you will find the quality very alike, I think it will come down to personal preference in the end.

You can see some more details here, read Rainer's and my post's : [a href=\"http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=22266&hl=]http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....topic=22266&hl=[/url]

Author Topic: 35mm Lenses: Cambo Wide DS vs Medium Format (Read 10533 times)