Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: U.S. Patent Office Rejects Two Epson Patents  (Read 2418 times)

John Hollenberg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1185
Logged

gkroeger

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 225
U.S. Patent Office Rejects Two Epson Patents
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2008, 11:49:40 am »

Quote
http://www.rechargermag.com/articles/57003/

http://www.rechargermag.com/articles/48147/

Interesting development...

--John
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=166717\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Interesting, and no doubt there needs to be some serious repudiation of patents of the obvious.  On the other hand, I am in no rush to put Ninestar ink in my 7800!

Glenn
Logged

John Hollenberg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1185
U.S. Patent Office Rejects Two Epson Patents
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2008, 01:28:43 pm »

Quote
Interesting, and no doubt there needs to be some serious repudiation of patents of the obvious.  On the other hand, I am in no rush to put Ninestar ink in my 7800!
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=166733\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Agreed.  Personally I wouldn't touch those clone inks, but would like others to have the freedom to do so.

--John
Logged

Kenneth Sky

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 463
    • http://
U.S. Patent Office Rejects Two Epson Patents
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2008, 05:05:11 pm »

Now that my Epson R800 has been relegated to 2nd string by my HP B9180, I felt comfortable using clone cartridges and Kirkland glossy paper (if you're going to go cheap, why not whole hog), and have found the results quite acceptable. The small carts on the Epson were constantly running out and not easily found at retail outlets. The price on the inks were kept high by the lack of competition. Sort of reminds me of "Big Pharma" with medicine. There's nothing like a bit of generic competition to favour the consumer.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up