You may call me old-fashioned, or, better, "retro"...
I use film, and I have no plans to change that, especially because a 39 MP camera is not in my budget.
Unfortunately I do not have enough space for an enlarger and trays... just enough for my PC and an Imacon 646 scanner.
I shoot 35mm and 6x7cm, edit the scans in Photoshop and print very large B/W prints (Epson printer).
My favourite films are Tmax 100 and Tri-X, they are souped in XTol 1:1. These are good films and a good developer, but there is a disadvantage.
My Imacon works like a condensor enlarger and emphasizeds the grain. As the grain becomes very visible I can not sharpen my landscape images as much as I would like to.
I heard some reports that it might be a better idea to use a developer that creates sharper negatives from the beginning so that there is not so much sharpening necessary... or staining developers... other friends tried to convince me using C-41 films like XP2... but I prefer silver films.
According to your experience, what is a better combination for very high quality scans for very high quality super-large prints?