THe 50 and 300 are the only two HC lenses i have not used at all. I see the same comments about bokeh and I find the bokeh with the 100 and 120 to be excellent. I once compared the canon 85 1.2 with the 100mm HC lens and shot wide open with both. They both gave nice bokeh-- slightly different but I could not say one was better than the other. The zeiss 110/2 is supposed to be the killer lens for bokeh but since i have never used I cannot make any comment.
I have considered the 50mm at times but to be honest, the 50-110 is such an great zoom it would be redundant except for the fact that for handholding, the 50mm lens would be a much better option. Historically I have rarely used my H2 without a tripod but with the H3D-31 and outstanding high iso, may want to use for more without a tripod
does anyone have experience with the 50?
it seems to me to be useful if using the camera in travels as it is the 35mm equivalent of30-35(?)
also
I have read in a thread (possibly in this forum)some extremely negative comments regarding the H lens family bokeh
would anyone care to comment?
many thanks
alex
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=166547\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]