It's possibly a flash template, connected to the title page - how could one otherwise do that without actually having flash (which actually costs more than Photoshop)?[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157623\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
You do not need Flash to produce Flash [swf] files, it's just that Flash is the most powerful [and difficult to learn!] way of doing it.
There are lots of programmes out there that output Flash files. Site grinder may be one of them.
If you are a professional photographer and you want a good professional website, why not employ a professional web designer? Web design is a damn site harder [and time consuming] to get right than taking pictures. Because if it looks right in photography it usually is right, whereas in web design, if it looks right, then it may or may not look right on another or even same browser. As evidenced by the differences viewed above, with the sample sites.
I have worked in a web design company [doing coding], but am I still considering getting someone else to write up the code for my next site. As it's more time/cost effective, than my learning all the current hacks to get a site working properly in all browsers.