which is better?

[user]

hello

can you tell me please which of these two is better?

http://stashbox.org/44554/1.jpg
http://stashbox.org/44557/2.jpg

thanks

[Wayne Fox]

hello

can you tell me please which of these two is better?

http://stashbox.org/44554/1.jpg
http://stashbox.org/44557/2.jpg

thanks
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=146722\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

What's your definition of "better"?  I see subtle differences, but I'm not sure I would classify any of them as better.

[Monito]

Using meaningful titles for threads is better, because it attracts people with actual knowledge on the topic and keeps idle riffraff out.

[Kagetsu]

Using meaningful titles for threads is better, because it attracts people with actual knowledge on the topic and keeps idle riffraff out.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=147066\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Personally I find the results of the first image a little more pleasing... If you want to point it down to something though... The blacks on the first image appear blacker (though if you post process, and shoot in Raw, I'd hazard a guess that you'd want to have control over the blacks yourself). The second has more aliasing, though there's more CA on it as well... Then there's issues with each one in all the corners. (depending which corner too).

I think the result of the first one is slightly better... or my personal preference.

I don't find either one technically superior to the other.

[user]

thats write, the first is better for me too
ok, it surely has more noise than the second, maybe the colors arent so vivid as the second's, but its so sharp!

the second has much purple inside the black and its so... soft, not to say a bit blurry

here are 2 of my findings for the second:
http://stashbox.org/44578/2a.jpg

is there any way to remove the noise? whats better, to have noise or to be soft/blurry/not sharp?