Topic: Olympus E-3... (Read 4283 times)

David Mantripp · « **on:** October 17, 2007, 03:48:37 am »

"Oly announced the long awaited (4+ years) Olympus E-3 Digital SLR"

What, since before the E-1 came out ? Dear me we're an impatient bunch, us Olympus users

michael · « **Reply #1 on:** October 17, 2007, 05:53:59 am »

The E1 was announced in March of 2004. According to my math that's 4+ years.

Michael

mbridgers · « **Reply #2 on:** October 17, 2007, 06:44:00 am »

Unless it's 2008 in Canada, that would be 3+ years.

NikosR · « **Reply #3 on:** October 17, 2007, 07:00:21 am »

2004+4=2008. Good thing Michael didn't choose a career in accounting or another arithmetically demanding field.

Ray · « **Reply #4 on:** October 17, 2007, 07:08:57 am »

Oops!

Actually, Phil Askey of dpreview did a full review the E-1 in November 2003 so it is 4+ years since the E-1 was released.

michael · « **Reply #5 on:** October 17, 2007, 07:55:40 am »

My mistake was not in saying 4+ years, which it was. Rather it was writing above that it was released in 2004, not 2003, - a simple typo.

So – are we all now happy with the historical timeline?

Michael

David Mantripp · « **Reply #6 on:** October 17, 2007, 04:48:06 pm »

Well, not really. Implying that we sad, misguided Olympus customers were ALL unhappy with our E-1s from the day they were annonced is, er, stretching it. It took a good 6 months.

Actually I recall a day in June 2004, in Iceland, where a bunch of photographers huddled in a minibus over their 20Ds and 1Ds MkIs all stared in amazement as I went out in the pouring rain with my E-1, ducked behind a torrential waterfall, took a couple of shots and came back, with the camera still working fine.

The shots were rubbish, mind you. I was never one to listen to advice :-)

Author Topic: Olympus E-3... (Read 4283 times)