One thing that bothers me about the Leica and Bosch and Fatman models is that they don't have a viewfinder for accurately placing the beam on a specific point. For those of you with these models, has this been an issue at all? Is the beam bright enough to see the spot on the target?
A number of the so called "hunting" rangefinders provide a viewfinder with a crosshair, which seem ideal. However, I have read that many (and maybe most) of the hunting type rangefinders aren't accurate under 20 meters. Can anyone recommend one of the hunting-type rangefinders that they have successfully used at shorter ranges?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=143146\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I have found the Leica Disto™ A3 to be adequately visible up to 35-40 ft. It seems that my visual acuity at those (and greater) distances is the issue, not so much whether or not the laser dot is "there". I have worked with some assistants and 1st AC's who have better eyes than I do, and they have not problem seeing the A3's dot out to 50 ft or so.
I borrowed a friend's Leica RangeMaster CRF 1200 (he's a wildlife photographer, and avid golfer), and found it to be quite useful. After looking into the accuracy specifications of the these monocular laser range finders, they only seem to hold approx 1m / 1yd accuracy up to 400 yds. In using the CRF 1200 with my Alpa 12TC, I found it usable (and accurate) for architectural and landscape / cityscape applications. I did not try it much closer than 25-30 ft. It is worth dropping by your nearest hunting / sport optics dealer and give it a shot. If I get a chance, I will give the CRF 1200 a test, from 50 ft and closer, next a tape measure, and see what I come up with.
Even without a viewfinder on the A3, as long as I keep my bubble levels consistent, I have not found there to be any issues getting accurate measurements. It takes a little getting used to, but with some practice, it becomes quite natural.
Regards,
Jordan