Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Digital Back Shoot Results  (Read 6821 times)

erikhillard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
Digital Back Shoot Results
« on: August 22, 2007, 12:23:58 pm »

We did a heavy shoot test with the new DBs.  This test was about speed and stress, not processing.  Here's a link to the Results PDF.  Lots of info so probably better to print it out and read versus scrolling and zooming on your screen.

Digital Back Shoot Out Results
Logged

Erik Hillard  Running Pixels [url=http:

fotodog33

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2007, 07:20:45 pm »

Why no Sinarbacks in your test?

Quote
We did a heavy shoot test with the new DBs.  This test was about speed and stress, not processing.  Here's a link to the Results PDF.  Lots of info so probably better to print it out and read versus scrolling and zooming on your screen.

Digital Back Shoot Out Results
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=134821\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Logged

paul_jones

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 574
    • http://www.paulrossjones.com
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2007, 07:25:42 pm »

Quote
Why no Sinarbacks in your test?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=134919\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

why no megavison backs in your test?
Logged
check my new website
[url=http://www.pau

erikhillard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2007, 07:39:41 pm »

As mentioned in the text of the report, we tested what was available to us.  Neither Sinar or Megavison were available to us in rental or loan in Los Angeles during the time all the other backs were.

If you have either back and would like us to test it, we definitely will.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2007, 07:41:43 pm by erikhillard »
Logged

Erik Hillard  Running Pixels [url=http:

fotodog33

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2007, 07:53:43 pm »

I would think Sinar's (and Megavision's) marketing dept would help.

SinarBron - 800-456-0203
Mega Vision 888-324-2580



Quote
As mentioned in the text of the report, we tested what was available to us.  Neither Sinar or Megavison were available to us in rental or loan in Los Angeles during the time all the other backs were.

If you have either back and would like us to test it, we definitely will.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=134922\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Logged

erikhillard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2007, 07:54:29 pm »

Quote
I would think Sinar's (and Megavision's) marketing dept would help.

SinarBron - 800-456-0203
Mega Vision 888-324-2580
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=134925\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Thanks..  I'll give them a ring when I get a chance..  E
Logged

Erik Hillard  Running Pixels [url=http:

paul_jones

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 574
    • http://www.paulrossjones.com
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2007, 08:25:36 pm »

Quote
As mentioned in the text of the report, we tested what was available to us.  Neither Sinar or Megavison were available to us in rental or loan in Los Angeles during the time all the other backs were.

If you have either back and would like us to test it, we definitely will.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=134922\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


i was joking about megavision..
Logged
check my new website
[url=http://www.pau

erikhillard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2007, 08:30:01 pm »

Quote
i was joking about megavision..
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=134931\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Yeah well some people thought I was joking when I said I was testing the H3D.  :-)  We almost tested an H20 too, just to get a historical perspective. I'll test (break) anything.  I love it.
Logged

Erik Hillard  Running Pixels [url=http:

EgillBjarki

  • Guest
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2007, 10:40:09 am »

Quote
We did a heavy shoot test with the new DBs.  This test was about speed and stress, not processing.  Here's a link to the Results PDF.  Lots of info so probably better to print it out and read versus scrolling and zooming on your screen.

Digital Back Shoot Out Results
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=134821\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Very intresting test, thanks for sharing. The file size differance between p45+ and the hasselblad CF39 back is enormus! Does anyone see big differance between the files? Are hasselblad just not as good in the compression department or is there a real differance there?
Logged

erikhillard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
Digital Back Shoot Results
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2007, 12:08:28 pm »

Quote
Very intresting test, thanks for sharing. The file size differance between p45+ and the hasselblad CF39 back is enormus! Does anyone see big differance between the files? Are hasselblad just not as good in the compression department or is there a real differance there?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=135604\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Phase IIQ RAW L files are quite compressed.
Logged

Erik Hillard  Running Pixels [url=http:
Pages: [1]   Go Up