So I think what I'm hearing here is that a canon 5D and a pano-head would be a less expensive alternative to a Hass. CF 22 back with all the trimmings provided size of imagery outside magazine format is not required? The pano-head would solve the wide angle "zoom" effect I have mentioned as being a detrement to composition, but I have a hard time thinking that if I'm going to commit to digital, why not start with the the better system.
Thoughts?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129700\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Sure, if you can afford it, can get the assignments that go with the CF22 definitely go for it. If budget is a concern the 5D, panohead & indeed good skills also in PS will be a great way to generate files that are acceptable for many clients. The 5D is a great camera system but the backs are simply better in some important areas.
My route was, film, D1, D1x, C-most, D200, Valeo11, Aptus17 & now even bigger.
It is also a matter of what works for you. I would prefer an older 24x36 back with Digiflex II (or Flexbody) anytime over the 5D but these can only be bought second hand nowadays. These aren't fit for everything either.
There are a lot of factors that you could take into the equation.
Another line of thought. You just enter and still have to built your client list, this normally takes a while (it took me a couple of years and I am still building). Postponing the investment into more expensive equipment means you can have the same later for less.
Etc..
