Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: why no reviews of the plus backs?  (Read 2777 times)

awofinden

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 173
why no reviews of the plus backs?
« on: June 18, 2007, 06:33:20 AM »

I dont understand, the plus backs have been out a while now and theres been no review from the usuall online reviewers including this site, whats going on?
Logged

ixpressraf

  • Guest
why no reviews of the plus backs?
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2007, 06:53:17 AM »

...and why never a review of a hasselblad back?????
Logged

Dustbak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2409
why no reviews of the plus backs?
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2007, 08:08:55 AM »

Quote
...and why never a review of a hasselblad back?????
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=123479\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Well, why not do one and write one?

Sounds like a fun thing to do. I would love to see the review on your CF39MS.  I know just the place where to put that review
Logged

Eric Zepeda

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 89
    • http://www.ericzepeda.com
why no reviews of the plus backs?
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2007, 09:04:22 AM »

I just got handed a P45+, so I'll let you know my thoughts in a few hours.

I would love to see a Hassy DB review, I've never had the opportunity to work with one. Everything here (NYC) is mainly Leaf and Phase.
Logged

eleanorbrown

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 635
    • Eleanor Brown Photography
why no reviews of the plus backs?
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2007, 09:11:41 AM »

I have a 45+ and would love to compare it to my previous non plus back but since the files are not yet supported in Lightroom or ACR 4.1,  I can't make a fair comparison.  I am limited to C1 for the Plus files, which, at present anyway, is far behind the competition in RAW processing.

On another note, I do know that I was able to put a Hoya R72 infrared filter over my lens with the P45 and get stunning sharp, clear infrared images.  With the 45+ doing the same yields dull, muddy infrared and I have to use a stop more exposure to get them....not worth doing.  I haven't been able to get anyone, and I mean anyone, at Phase to tell me what the difference in these two backs is that makes IR photography impossible with the plus backs.

Eleanor
http://www.eleanorbrown.com

awofinden

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 173
why no reviews of the plus backs?
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2007, 09:13:19 AM »

Quote
I have a 45+ and would love to compare it to my previous non plus back but since the files are not yet supported in Lightroom or ACR 4.1,  I can't make a fair comparison.  I am limited to C1 for the Plus files, which, at present anyway, is far behind the competition in RAW processing.

On another note, I do know that I was able to put a Hoya R72 infrared filter over my lens with the P45 and get stunning sharp, clear infrared images.  With the 45+ doing the same yields dull, muddy infrared and I have to use a stop more exposure to get them....not worth doing.  I haven't been able to get anyone, and I mean anyone, at Phase to tell me what the difference in these two backs is that makes IR photography impossible with the plus backs.

Eleanor
http://www.eleanorbrown.com
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=123506\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Sounds strange, I want to know why Michael hasen't reviewed one yet. Michael?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up