Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sunset at Arches  (Read 4055 times)

dobson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
    • http://
Sunset at Arches
« on: March 25, 2007, 03:11:38 pm »

Here are two photos taken recently in Arches National Park. While they are of the same subject and direction, the framing is quite different. I would like to hear opinions on which one people prefer and why. Any thoughts an how to improve them would also be appreciated.

[attachment=2170:attachment]

[attachment=2171:attachment]


Phillip
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Sunset at Arches
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2007, 04:31:27 pm »

I'd go with the first one.  The second one leaves too much blank negative space in the bottom for my taste.  I also like the last vestiges of the sun and the clouds on the right better in the first image.

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

Sr.Cordeiro

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/srcordeiro
Sunset at Arches
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2007, 06:23:46 am »

Hello,

I prefer the second one. The difference in scales and proportions make the pomposition more interesting. The first one is too much flat on my opinion. I also like the brighter area on the second one, i adds a sense of tonal depth and make a contrast with the dark areas.
Logged

dobson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
    • http://
Sunset at Arches
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2007, 04:25:05 pm »

I thank both of you for your advice. I took your comments into mind and reprocessed the photo. I'm still not sure about the cropping, but I prefer this to the previous version.

[attachment=2200:attachment]

I brought out detail in the shadows and adjusted the crop a bit in this version.

Phillip
Logged

popnfresh

  • Guest
Sunset at Arches
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2007, 05:44:20 pm »

Quote
I thank both of you for your advice. I took your comments into mind and reprocessed the photo. I'm still not sure about the cropping, but I prefer this to the previous version.

[attachment=2200:attachment]

I brought out detail in the shadows and adjusted the crop a bit in this version.

Phillip
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109445\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I think this is an improvement.

I'd crop out a bit of the ground below the tree to tighten up the composition and I think you're there.
Logged

robertvine

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 56
    • http://www.robertvinephotography.com.au
Sunset at Arches
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2007, 08:38:42 am »

Quote
I thank both of you for your advice. I took your comments into mind and reprocessed the photo. I'm still not sure about the cropping, but I prefer this to the previous version.

[attachment=2200:attachment]

I brought out detail in the shadows and adjusted the crop a bit in this version.

Phillip
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109445\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Yep, this is the better one. The closer crop is a lot stronger, I find the best feautre to be the inclusion of a similar tree in the background. So subtle in telling the viewer that there were many of these trees around.
Logged
Robert Vine
Darwin, Australia Canon 6D +
Pages: [1]   Go Up