Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Photoshop Picture Package Template 8x12  (Read 5239 times)

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Photoshop Picture Package Template 8x12
« on: December 12, 2006, 03:19:25 am »

For those of you who make wallet siezd pritns for senior pictures or other areas, you know if you don't use a generator of some sort, it's time consuming.

I starting using PS CS2's Picture Package, but it's presets are for film aspect ratios, and the sizes you get for the images suck.

I wanted a 8x12 image, which is standard aspect ratio for digital, with 4 images across and four down using a 2"x3" size (for wallets). At 2x3, the will fit perfectly edge to edge. At traditional wallet size, you get 8 images on a 8 x 12 with wasted space. At 2x3 you get 16 on an 8x12.

Anyway, if you want to do that in Picture Package you have to write your own template file. It's not hard, but it took me a while to figure it out and write it. So if you want to save yourself the time, here it is. See directions below:

II 8 12 0
(16) 2x3
;first row
0 0 2 3
2 0 2 3
4 0 2 3
6 0 2 3
;second row
0 3 2 3
2 3 2 3
4 3 2 3
6 3 2 3
;third row
0 6 2 3
2 6 2 3
4 6 2 3
6 6 2 3
;fourth row
0 9 2 3
2 9 2 3
4 9 2 3
6 9 2 3

Copy that information into a txt file, and name the file whatever you want relating to an 8x12 with 16 2x3" images. Then copy the file into your Photoshop directory:
%root%/presets/layouts. Then it is visible in Picture Package.

If you want guide lines inbetween the images, stroke at 5 px the original image. Works nicely. If anyone thinks this is a good post, maybe it can be put in a sticky somewhere. It's a pretty standard need I would think.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Photoshop Picture Package Template 8x12
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2006, 10:43:10 am »

Your template looks quite useful. It is indeed ironic that PSCS2 assumes film aspect ratios in this day and age.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

pcrov

  • Guest
Photoshop Picture Package Template 8x12
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2006, 09:34:56 pm »

They're not really "film" aspect ratios, just common print sizes. Most of the aspect ratios don't match that of 35mm film at all. And any way you print it you're gonna need a mat and frame too, which come pre-made (cheaper) in those common sizes.

A handy picture package none-the-less.
Logged

dwdallam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2044
    • http://www.dwdallam.com
Photoshop Picture Package Template 8x12
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2007, 12:39:19 am »

Quote
They're not really "film" aspect ratios, just common print sizes. Most of the aspect ratios don't match that of 35mm film at all. And any way you print it you're gonna need a mat and frame too, which come pre-made (cheaper) in those common sizes.

A handy picture package none-the-less.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=90185\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Not any cheaper really unless you still look for frams at wallmart of Kmart, which I do not. But you are right. That size is still popular eventhough it requieres us to crop our images to that size. With all of the people using digital now--popular snapshot shooter--wanting to frame their images, it's dumbfounding why mainstream manufactueres/resellers try to sell us frames that requiere them to cut off aprt of their prints.

I do think that 35mm film aspect ratio will resize perfectly to 11 x 14 though w/o cropping. That's the main point of how useless that aspect ratio is now--what is it, something like 4:3 unlike digital which is 2:3?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up