I shoot a lot of fine art for catalogue reproduction. Images are processed on PC.
I use a Gretag Macbeth CC all shots.
The images are processed in Adobe 1998 and corrected using a combination of adjustments in ACR, followed by Curves and Hue/Sat in CS2.
I then end up with four of the six grey patches (white, the two middle greys and black) set to their exact RGB values.
The RGBY patches are similarly corrected.
All values are set as per the table in this link.........
http://www.babelcolor.com/download/RGB%20C...olorChecker.pdfScroll down to p.5.
e.g. the Red patch is set to 155, 52, 59.
The Curves and H/S settings are then saved and applied to all other images.
This is colour correction strictly by numbers. As Fraser says, when you do it this way, you might as well be using a B&W monitor. True.
My problem is that my client says that the images are too bright on his three MACs.
Given that I am working blind; i.e. I am processing afterwards, without sight of the actual artworks, I have to rely on RGB values only.
What could be wrong? Is my method flawed? Could it be the fault of my client's MACs? I know nothing about MACs.
Obviously, this is a gamma (brightness) issue. There is no problem with the colour. i.e. If they reduce the brightness on their screens, the images look fine.
But, I just want to be sure that I'm not the one at fault.
Thanks.
D.