Can you refrain from misleading people? does the IQ1 come with wireless?
Is this a Lie from Digital T to push people to buy the IQ3? https://digitaltransitions.com/phase-one-iq1-100mp-vs-iq3-100mp/ ?
I don't know if there is some kind of desperation going on or what (the original post was not about P1 lacking something but Fuji)
but misleading people into buying something because it has a particular feature that it does not (if I believe DT) is not nice.
Best regards,
JDuncan - what on earth are you talking about? Do you even know what you're talking about?
Do you even know who I am?
Neither I nor my company, Capture Integration, has any association with Digital Transitions, whatsoever. Doug Peterson may be "wildly biased" as he likes to say, and advertorializes on behalf of Phase One, and that is fine and his call, but I have zero association with Doug or DT, the company he works for.
I've been a member of Lula for over 10 years and have posted over 1,400 posts of objective and factual information, mostly about Phase One, but not restricted only to Phase One (we do carry other products such as Alpa Cameras, Profoto lighting, even Hasselblad cameras at times). Many of my clients are members of this forum.
Bob Shaw posted this:
"the IQ3 in Australia costs $49,990 and I bought the X1D for $7600".
That is what is misleading (though in fairness to Bob, perhaps not intentionally), comparing the price of a Phase One 100mp full frame 645 model to a 50mp crop sensor X1D. What I posted is
not misleading, nor was there any attempt to mislead. Contrarily, the attempt was to provide accuracy and clarity. How did I not do so? What I posted was the correct price for an IQ350 (which does use the same sensor as an X1D) and also mentioned an IQ150 was only $14,990. I never even mentioned WiFi, but I mentioned the IQ350 first because it does indeed have wifi and is a more apples to apples comparison to an X1D (pursuant to the original topic). If I had only mentioned the IQ150 and somehow implied that it had wifi, then yes, that would have been misleading. But I did not do such a thing.
I don't care what any original topic is. If someone posts information that is misleading or inaccurate, and I have expertise in the matter, I'll post a correction. I have every right to do so, and the Lula members have a right to truth. Note that I did not interject Phase One into the topic, someone else did.
Finally, you do realize that the most offensive thing you can ever say to me is to question my integrity. And before you do so, perhaps you should first review things factually and know exactly who you're talking about.
Steve Hendrix/CI