I'm hardly a fan of Trump, Tillerson, or Pompeo, but . . .
The secretary of state's policy preferences are expected to align with those of the president. Pompeo's do; Tillerson's—he is accustomed to being the guy who makes the policy—at least occasionally did not. And Tillerson was caught referring to el señor Loco as "a moron," which, however technically accurate, is no way to ingratiate yourself to el jefe.
Pompeo is no dope. He has strong political views, which I think irrationally biased his behavior during the Benghazi hearings in the House of Representatives, but he has supported the unanimous conclusions by the U.S. intelligence "community" regarding attempts by Russian intelligence services to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election, despite Trump's denials, and I'm willing to bet he will listen to the foreign service officers at State, as well.
I also believe a director of central intelligence who is a career civil servant is more likely than a political appointee to make certain the agency operates within the strict boundaries of the law. I wouldn't be particularly concerned about Gina Haspel's involvement in controversial practices, because she—like any other career federal employee (myself included, when I worked for the U.S. government)—was required to carry out any presumptively-legal instructions she received from her management.