I used to be a Nikon guy for over 25 years but sold the kit when the 20D came out. Now that I see Zeiss with several new lenses for the F mount, I am looking at Nikon again with new eyes. The point being, that Canon's "coasting" may very well cost them dearly as different and exciting alternatives to Canon pro level equipment appear.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=79122\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
If could be argued that the 1ds2 was only a minor model change compared to the 1ds. A little bit more detail (but not 1.5 times more as the resolution gap might have suggeste), some long overdue interface enhancements that closed a bit the gap with Nikon D2 series and that's basically it.
Looking at the big picture, Canon hasn't released anything significant technologically for 4 years. They must be working on a paradigm shift, or have come to realize that the big money is in the consumer arena.
Speaking of high end, many sources seem to indicate that Nikon has been working for a long time on FF sensor Pro bodies, and my personnal guess is that 07 is the target year for its release along with suitable lenses. Considering how solid all Nikon entries have been in the past years, I expect that we won't be disapointed by their proposal.
As a result, we might end up in a situation where the Canon lead - that used to be about 2 years for some users for whom FF was key - will have been reduced to a mere few months.
I would personnally prefer Nikon to keep working on the DX line with a 20MP D3x, but I don't see this happening. It would be the best for my landscape needs though.
Regards,
Bernard