Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ultimate Point and shoot?  (Read 3953 times)

rethmeier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 795
    • http://www.willemrethmeier.com
Ultimate Point and shoot?
« on: September 26, 2006, 08:58:46 pm »

Will this be the ultimate Point and Shoot?


http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp
Logged
Willem Rethmeier
www.willemrethmeier.com

augg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 51
Ultimate Point and shoot?
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2006, 06:08:02 pm »

When I think of point and shoot I think of my old black hexar with the f2 lens. Why doesn't anyone make a digital point and shoot with a fast lens? (Besides the canon g5 which I do like but where are the current fast lens cameras?

dan
Logged

Andrew Teakle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 90
    • http://www.andrewteakle.com
Ultimate Point and shoot?
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2006, 06:45:57 pm »

Image quality may be superb, ergonomics sublime, size and weight unobtrusive, but I would never buy a camera with a fixed focal length and no way to change lenses. Who shoots at 28mm exclusively? Even a 3x zoom (28-84mm) would increase its usability a million-fold. Why waste all those development resources on a camera that is so restricted in its usability.  

As you might guess, I was not brought up in the Leica rangefinder school of street photography. I started with 35mm and a couple of zooms, so I've never been restricted in focal length.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2006, 06:46:50 pm by tesseraphoto »
Logged
Andrew

ericstaud

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 396
    • www.ericstaudenmaier.com
Ultimate Point and shoot?
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2006, 08:07:13 pm »

"but I would never buy a camera with a fixed focal length and no way to change lenses. Who shoots at 28mm exclusively? Even a 3x zoom (28-84mm) would increase its usability a million-fold. Why waste all those development resources on a camera that is so restricted in its usability."


I took the Nikon 28mm F1.4 out of town for a weekend.  Best vacation photos I ever made.  Also went to a friends wedding that weekend and shot 100 pictures with the 1.4.  The couple was blown away by the results compared to the pro wedding shooter they hired.

Of course I usually take 2 cameras and 3 lenses everywhere I go.  But I rarely get better results than I did that 3 day weekend.

I really want to buy a DP1.  My only question is about High ASA shooting.  If it excels at 800 or 1600 It might temper the F4 limitation.

-Eric
« Last Edit: September 27, 2006, 08:08:32 pm by ericstaud »
Logged

Nill Toulme

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 738
    • http://www.toulmephoto.com
Ultimate Point and shoot?
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2006, 08:38:27 pm »

Personally, I think the ultimate P&S for the time being is going to be a 400D with Sigma's just-announced 18-200 OS (image stabilized) zoom.  I want one.

Nill
~~
www.toulme.net
Logged

cgf

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
    • http://
Ultimate Point and shoot?
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2006, 10:31:20 am »

Quote
Will this be the ultimate Point and Shoot?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=77923\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


About the same size as my LX1 but with a DSLR-sized sensor and a fixed lens? They can't make this fast enough for me! My wallet feels lighter already
Logged

dbell

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 131
Ultimate Point and shoot?
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2006, 09:30:08 pm »

Quote
Will this be the ultimate Point and Shoot?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=77923\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

With that lens, it's not MY ultimate P&S. I do most of my best work with "normal" or short telephoto lenses. In 35mm format, 28 is too short for me. I don't necessarily need a zoom but I wouldn't be happy with nothing but a wide lens.  

I also want decent manual controls and an optical viewfinder (although those are less critical to me than a lens that suits what I do). When I was shooting film, a K1000 or FM2 with a fast 50mm lens was just about my perfect "walking around" camera.


--
Daniel Bell
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up