Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood  (Read 3092 times)

drralph

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 197
    • Ralph's Instagram
Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« on: January 26, 2018, 07:34:42 am »

I am planning a new set of frames for personal use, for displaying my own work in my home.  I plan to swap out the images several times a year.  I have always used Nielsen aluminum frames for this purpose.  It has proved a bit more work to change the images than I would like, and resulted in less rotation than I envisioned, but was manageable.

I am considering a switch to wood frames, which have more aesthetic appeal.  I am concerned that the bending and straightening of the flexible points may be a less satisfactory method of image exchange than the spring clips on the Nielsen frames.  Does anyone have experience with repeated image swapping in wood frames?

dgberg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2763
    • http://bergsprintstudio.com http://bergscustomfurniture.com
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2018, 09:11:49 am »

The pins should not be a problem especially if you have one of these.

RoyH

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
    • Reflective Photo
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2018, 09:21:12 am »

I have been using some basic black frames from Aaron Brothers for exactly the same purpose for about 16 months now and have changed the photos at least a dozen times in multiple frames without a single issue with bending the points. Takes me 2 to 3 minutes to change out an image. I do have a point driver like Dan has shown just in case...

Good Luck,

Roy
Logged

drralph

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 197
    • Ralph's Instagram
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2018, 10:04:23 am »

That is reassuring.

One more thing, do you recommend mounting a print directly onto an acid free foam board, or would you use a blank mat for mounting, with the foam board behind that?

framah

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2018, 10:16:44 am »

As they are for your own use, what type of material you use doesn't matter.. either AF foam core or a rag mat board is ok especially seing as how you are hard mounting and not just  T hinging.

Any fully adhesive mounting proess is,by nature, not archival so it then doesn't matter what you mount it to..it could be regular FC as it is cheaper.

As for how to have a system  to hold the package in the frame, they make what are called swing clips or spring clips that screw into the frame and then you swing the spring over the package to hold it in place usually minimum 2 to a side. Swing back over the frame to remove and replace.
Logged
"It took a  lifetime of suffering and personal sacrifice to develop my keen aesthetic sense."

drralph

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 197
    • Ralph's Instagram
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2018, 03:47:19 pm »

As for how to have a system  to hold the package in the frame, they make what are called swing clips or spring clips that screw into the frame and then you swing the spring over the package to hold it in place usually minimum 2 to a side. Swing back over the frame to remove and replace.

Those are cool!  A possible alternative to buying a point driver (but the kid in me wants one!)  I am using mylar photo corners rather than dry mount, so I am shooting for a fully archival approach.

BradSmith

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 772
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2018, 03:00:13 pm »

I have many of my prints hanging in my home and rotate them fairly often.  I've tried wooden frames in the past, but gave up because of having to mess with the black pins (I don't have a driver tool).  So, years ago, I settled on black aluminum sectional frames.  They do 2 things for me.  First I find them easy to put together and take apart.  Secondly, they allow me to have several different lengths on hand, and I can size my prints and frame them to aspect ratios that are best for my prints, rather than shoehorning my almost always cropped final prints into standard sized wooden frames.

These work best for me.
Brad
Logged

John Caldwell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2018, 09:19:03 pm »

For some of the reasons you describe, I stopped framing images in our home. Now we mount to gator, laminate, band the edges and hang. The images are printed to the edge of the paper.

Cost is low, no big deal when its time for them to come down. In honesty, the prints look better than when framed.

Not what you asked, but since I'd been down a similar road, I took the liberty of chiming in.

John Caldwell
Logged

gdsf2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2018, 12:18:51 am »

For some of the reasons you describe, I stopped framing images in our home. Now we mount to gator, laminate, band the edges and hang. The images are printed to the edge of the paper.

Cost is low, no big deal when its time for them to come down. In honesty, the prints look better than when framed.

Not what you asked, but since I'd been down a similar road, I took the liberty of chiming in.

John Caldwell

John,

So, what would a 16x20 cost using this method?  Also, why laminate?  Does the lamination cause glare?  I imagine it would take away from a matte surface.

Thanks,

Jerry
Logged

mbaginy

  • Guest
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2018, 02:37:25 am »

I prefer frames from the company Halbe.  They use a magnetic connection of the frame which allows switching images in very short time (only seconds if you're in a rush).  Also, there are no springs or clips which might wear and brake.  I've accumulated over 30 frames in three sites for various exhibitions and am continually delighted how quick it is to exchange images.  Their overall material and build quality is excellent!
Logged

John Caldwell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2018, 12:21:28 pm »

What would a 16x20 cost using this method?  Also, why laminate?  Does the lamination cause glare?  I imagine it would take away from a matte surface.

Thanks,

Jerry

Jerry, virtually all of my printing that's handled this way is on PK paper. Canson Baryta Photographique and Epson Legacy Baryta are my routinely used materials, but a gloss paper is also good. The laminates are "satin" in finish, but very matte surface laminates are also available, as are high gloss laminates. The satin materials offer the best compromise between maintaining color gamut, contrast and Dmax. Glare is absolutely not an issue unless a high gloss laminate is used. Occasionally an image calls for metallic paper, and in that instance a glossy laminate is used.

Rarely do I print smaller than 17x26, and the finished cost for that size is about $30, provided I produce the print (which is always the case). I often make much larger prints than this, and that's a circumstance where framing and museum glass would not only break the bank, but just be totally impractical.

Initially there was some adjustment of mindset needed to get away from the fine art approach, with Hahnemüle Matte media, well done frames and, always, museum glass. But I gotta say, that I enjoy my prints much more now than ever, and the prints that I present as gifts make a big impression. Simply printing to the edge of the canvas and dispensing with matte and frame allows the images to speak more clearly, in my eyes. Since my images nearly always need some sort of legend describing location, date, age of persons shown (if they're children) etc. I photoshop a discreet "badge" at the bottom corner of the printed image posing that legend.

This brings up the topic of canvas prints. I hate canvas prints.

Matte media should not be laminated, in my opinion. If you want to mount a matte print in this way, you'll need to spray or treat the printed surface in some way. I have used Print Shield spray for the rare matte prints I've mounted and they look very fine. But you'd need to exercise much greater care with a matte print surface unless there is some heavy and durable surface protectant applied and, at that point, you may as well laminate PK paper perhaps.

I get that this is not an approach to prints that art conservationists would endorse. This is a personal decision, naturally; one that my mother used to say is between the artist and his or her god. But consider giving a few images a try, Jerry.

John Caldwell
« Last Edit: January 28, 2018, 12:28:57 pm by John Caldwell »
Logged

jrsforums

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1288
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2018, 12:30:21 pm »

For some of the reasons you describe, I stopped framing images in our home. Now we mount to gator, laminate, band the edges and hang. The images are printed to the edge of the paper.

Cost is low, no big deal when its time for them to come down. In honesty, the prints look better than when framed.

Not what you asked, but since I'd been down a similar road, I took the liberty of chiming in.

John Caldwell

How do you laminate and band?
Logged
John

John Caldwell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2018, 12:33:18 pm »

How do you laminate and band?

I don't. The prints are taken to a local graphics company for the gator mount, laminate and edge band. Depending on the print size, the gator rear surface is either routed, or we glue wood blocks with eyelets for hanging.

Modesty aside, my work is quite rare in their shop. Most of their work centers on sports memorabilia art (we're in Pittsburgh) or health care advertising. But I'm in my 12th year of handling much of my printing this way. No regrets.
« Last Edit: January 28, 2018, 12:44:47 pm by John Caldwell »
Logged

stockjock

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2018, 03:05:38 pm »

I don't. The prints are taken to a local graphics company for the gator mount, laminate and edge band. Depending on the print size, the gator rear surface is either routed, or we glue wood blocks with eyelets for hanging.

Modesty aside, my work is quite rare in their shop. Most of their work centers on sports memorabilia art (we're in Pittsburgh) or health care advertising. But I'm in my 12th year of handling much of my printing this way. No regrets.

You should buy that company a bottle of of good Scotch each year if they only charge $30 to mount, laminate, and band a 17x26" print!  If anybody knows of a company in the Seattle area that can approach those prices I would love to get a recommendation.
Logged

CeeVee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2018, 03:38:47 pm »

For some of the reasons you describe, I stopped framing images in our home. Now we mount to gator, laminate, band the edges and hang. The images are printed to the edge of the paper.

Cost is low, no big deal when its time for them to come down. In honesty, the prints look better than when framed.

Not what you asked, but since I'd been down a similar road, I took the liberty of chiming in.

John Caldwell
How are you banding?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

Logged

CeeVee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 111
Re: Frames: Aluminum vs. Wood
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2018, 03:40:17 pm »

Sorry, I see you've replied already.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up