Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Looking for a thick matt paper  (Read 7599 times)

JudyKonopka

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
Looking for a thick matt paper
« on: January 16, 2018, 05:18:10 pm »

Hi,

I sell both photo prints and art prints.  I started the photo business first and regularly use Pauolo Duro Satin for my photographic prints (Red River).  I used the same paper for my other store which sells original Mid-century designs.  My first review came back AWFUL!  They cited the paper as thin, cheap and glossy.  :'(.

Looking at this as a positive, I believe I should offer a mat paper.  Can anyone recommend a good (not bright white) mat paper for "posters"?  I sell original artwork I created in Illustrator and have a Canon Pro-2000.

Thanks!
Logged

mearussi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 787
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2018, 05:25:43 pm »

There's a lot of really nice papers, but they can be expensive. What kind of price range are you wanting?
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2018, 07:28:13 pm »

Canon Premium Fine Art Smooth does a wonderful job in that printer. The Blacks are superb for a matte paper. You can read my review of it in my Canon Pro-2000 printer review on this website, as well as reviews of a number of other fine matte papers.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

JudyKonopka

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2018, 08:41:32 pm »

There's a lot of really nice papers, but they can be expensive. What kind of price range are you wanting?

Between $90 and $120 for a 24' 100 foot roll
Logged

mearussi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 787
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2018, 10:34:20 pm »

Between $90 and $120 for a 24' 100 foot roll
That is really cheap. At that price thin paper is about the only thing you'll find.

I don't deal much with that end of the market, but here's one suggestion. It's satin instead of glossy and the color is decent and it's not too thin (depending on your definition):
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1107197-REG/breathing_color_vibrance24100_vibrance_luster_photo_paper.html

Here's a matte version, even cheaper but also thinner:
 https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1107207-REG/breathing_color_vibmatte24100_vibrance_photo_matte_paper.html

Here's a higher quality version, but at about 2x what you wanted to pay:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1107171-REG/breathing_color_adt3002450_600mt_decor_art_paper.html

You can buy sample rolls and test them out. Maybe someone else here can offer other suggestions.
Logged

Panagiotis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 441
    • Fine Art Print
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2018, 01:01:11 am »

They cited the paper as thin, cheap and glossy.  :'(.

My recommendation is thin, matt, it feels heavier than 200gr/m and it's excellent on the PRO-1000! At small sizes it feels like an expensive fine art paper. It's my most used paper. I buy the 17' 30m/100ft roll and cut it to sheets. The 24' one is at the top of your price range:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1010951-REG/hahnemuhle_10643101_matt_fibre_200_inkjet.html

Logged

deanwork

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2400
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2018, 09:41:56 am »

This is what I've been using. Nice gamut and coating . thick 280 gsm and very good price. Don't know who actually makes this media

http://www.lexjet.com/sunset-photo-matte-paper-280g


Does anyone have any experience with this Moab matte. The price certainly is right. Especially for big rolls.

Don't know any of these papers have been tested for longevity.

http://shadesofpaper.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=3958_3961_3407_3996_4006

The breathing color is thick and dirt cheap, haven't tried it

https://www.breathingcolor.com/vibrance-photo-matte




Hi,

I sell both photo prints and art prints.  I started the photo business first and regularly use Pauolo Duro Satin for my photographic prints (Red River).  I used the same paper for my other store which sells original Mid-century designs.  My first review came back AWFUL!  They cited the paper as thin, cheap and glossy.  :'(.

Looking at this as a positive, I believe I should offer a mat paper.  Can anyone recommend a good (not bright white) mat paper for "posters"?  I sell original artwork I created in Illustrator and have a Canon Pro-2000.

Thanks!
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 09:57:00 am by deanwork »
Logged

I.T. Supplies

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 529
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2018, 10:37:40 am »

You'll also want to figure out the thickness options.  If you're in a certain price range, this can narrow available options depending on brands and the sizes available.  Most thicker media may be more expensive (this links to brand still and what the product is made of) but is not always the case.

BC paper may be decent, but depending if you need the product quickly vs waiting for it to arrive from another company and then shipping.  B&H states 7-14 day special order for BC paper since they are reselling BC media (both across country from each other).

If you're looking for a poster type paper that's not bright white, maybe look at something like Epson Enhanced Matte 192gsm which is about $55 for 24"x100'.

Otherwise, other options that would be available upfront in a nicer type paper for same size would be Moab Lasal Matte 230gsm for about $80 for 24"x100'.

LexJet Sunset products usually are Fredrix products (we used to carry Fredrix until they went with a specific reseller).

How quickly are you looking to get the paper?  If samples are available, this can help with testing upfront.  Reviews of the papers are also helpful to make a decision properly.

Atlex.com
Logged

MHMG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1285
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2018, 11:14:57 am »

This is what I've been using. Nice gamut and coating . thick 280 gsm and very good price. Don't know who actually makes this media

http://www.lexjet.com/sunset-photo-matte-paper-280g


Does anyone have any experience with this Moab matte. The price certainly is right. Especially for big rolls.

Don't know any of these papers have been tested for longevity.

http://shadesofpaper.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=3958_3961_3407_3996_4006

The breathing color is thick and dirt cheap, haven't tried it

https://www.breathingcolor.com/vibrance-photo-matte

John, I have a sample of the Moab Lasal Photo matte in-house. No real need to test it, it's loaded with high OBA content as are undoubtedly the other two low cost matte media you mentioned. One can expect all of these low cost matte papers to perform rather poorly in longevity testing much like Epson's Premium Presentation Paper Matte (formerly called "heavyweight matte" and before that "archival matte" which it clearly was not).  Anyway, BreathingColor probably describes this class of low cost alphacellulose cast coated high OBA papers best:

"* Great for fine art reproduction and photo printing in the consumer and décor markets
* Perfect for proofing, signage, backdrops, and murals...
* Bright white color lends itself great for high-contrast and black and white images

Judy,  note especially the "consumer and décor" description and how BC avoids calling this an "archival fine art" media. Also "Bright white" is almost always marketing code words for moderate to high OBA content which will result in a tired somewhat grayish-yellow media whitepoint color long before good OEM pigmented inks show much fade.

Lastly, if you are printing on the Pro-2000, there is precious little longevity data on the Pro-11/12 ink set at this time. Aardenburg has only three media in test printed with Pro-11 inks at the moment, and these three samples are indicating the latest Canon Pigment ink set is fairly sensitive to media chemistry with regards to light fade resistance of the inks. One of the samples in test is Moab Entrada Rag Natural (avoid the Bright version due to relatively high OBA content). The Entrada Natural Rag paper has a cotton base and coating chemistry that is helping the Pro-11 ink set achieve at least 2x better fade resistance compared to the other two media I have in test. Indeed, Entrada Natural seems to play nice with all of today's OEM ink sets with respect to both initial image quality and lightfastness performance, but it's also significantly higher in cost than your desired price point. However, it comes in both single and double-sided versions at differing thicknesses which also affect price point somewhat, but all share the same coating chemistry.  If you ever decide to offer a higher quality fine art print that you can claim is an "archival pigment print" with confidence, then Moab Entrada Natural would be a good place to start. Also, unlike a lot of today's inkjet coatings,the Entrada Natural image receptor coating takes graphite pencil really well which is how many artists prefer to sign their work.

kind regards,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 11:39:19 am by MHMG »
Logged

deanwork

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2400
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2018, 03:18:55 pm »

Yes that's the trouble Mark, no good inexpensive matte alpha papers that I can find with the possible exception of that Hahnemühle matte that was mentioned in this thread . I have not seen it and is not sold by very many distributors at all so I would worry about its availability in the future. Hahnemühle describes it as "warm".

There are the Ink Press rag papers, warm and cool, that have outstanding off the chart longevity ratings from Wilhelm ( for what that is worth ) but they are so close to Hahnemühle and Canson that they don't qualify as a quality budget paper.

As a printmaker my clients fall into two categories, those that want the best looking and most permanent
Media they can get, which is about 85% of my clients as I don't print ad work for temporary applications.
And the 20% that just want it to look great in exhibition and in which price is more important than extended longevity.  The vast majority of the second category have me print on the Canson Photo Premium Satin ( made in Germany ) that clearly has oba but neverthe less looks great in exhibiting large prints mounted to dibond etc . I need to decide on another less expensive fiber matte that is not totally warm, to have around, but like you guys mentioned I haven't found one . Moab Entrada is great but really the same price point as Hah Photorag.

John
Logged

MHMG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1285
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2018, 03:46:21 pm »

..Moab Entrada is great but really the same price point as Hah Photorag.

John

Check Atlex.com pricing. The 40 foot 44 inch roll of Entrada Natural 300gsm is significantly less expensive than HN photo Rag, about $185 versus $312 for HN Photo Rag at both Atlex and B&H. I know ShadesofPaper is also great to work with, and will give a substantial discount over B&H pricing for good customers, but I don't think it will be that much! For whatever reasons, ShadesofPaper doesn't stock many Legion papers and Moab is part of the legion paper group.

The great pricing I can find on Entrada Natural is a big incentive for me to use it, longevity is as good as it gets, and it's double-sided coating virtue allows me to make perfect proof prints on the verso of reject prints (I don't make many rejects but definitely enough to serve as free proofing paper!). Plus, all my serious work gets back-printed, and having same quality output on the verso is really nice.

cheers,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com
Logged

MHMG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1285
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2018, 04:05:50 pm »

Another very nice lower cost matte fine art paper to consider is Red River Aurora Natural (not the bright version). At about $62 for a 24-inch 50 ft roll it comes quite close to Judy's price point. There's a notice on the RR website that the new batches will be a little thicker, i.e., with basis weight = 300gsm. Only downside, is that it's best to order a few rolls at a time since Red River charges shipping fees, whereas other dealers absorb shipping costs in their quoted pricing.

Aurora Natural is also a full cotton base sheet, not alpha cellulose.  Aardenburg Imaging & Archives has tested it in the past with Epson K3 inks, and the scores were about as good as it gets for K3 lightfastness. New tests of this paper on Canon's latest Pro-11 would need to be run to confirm how it performs with Canon's Lucia Pro 11 ink set, but my guess is it will be a pretty good performer on Judy's Canon Pro-2000.  Aurora Natural is OBA-free, slightly but not significantly warm (CIELAB b* value is about 2.0).

kind regards,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 04:10:58 pm by MHMG »
Logged

deanwork

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2400
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2018, 05:07:58 pm »

That Red River sounds like a good price for non oba. I'll check it out. Like you said, hardly anything isn't flooded with dye brighteners in the lower price range.

The Altec price sounds like a temporary discount for Moab Entrada as both B&H and Moab website sell it for $240.00 a 44" roll. Though that is about $80.00 less than Photorag.

The Entrada is a little yellower than Photorag 308 from the new samples I have here,  and obviously warmer than Photorag UltraSmooth.

Mark,  do you think Photorag UltraSmooth is significantly less stable than 308 for serious work. Your tests do show the paper white is a little less stable. I gotta replace the Rag Photographique, just no dmax left at all with all my inks and UltraSmooth is the closest thing to what it used to be 1.75 dmax with the Vivera pigments, where my Canson and Epson Legacy Rag Photo has crashed to1.68 ( from 1.8 which it usd to be.

 I will stock some Entrada as well. It would be especially nice with warmer prints. This is the year I'm experimenting with papers.

I'm really interested in product not changing at all overtime. Hahnemühle has been the most consistent I've ever used, but the damn rolls are too short. They should be 50 feet long  not 40 for that price.

John






Another very nice lower cost matte fine art paper to consider is Red River Aurora Natural (not the bright version). At about $62 for a 24-inch 50 ft roll it comes quite close to Judy's price point. There's a notice on the RR website that the new batches will be a little thicker, i.e., with basis weight = 300gsm. Only downside, is that it's best to order a few rolls at a time since Red River charges shipping fees, whereas other dealers absorb shipping costs in their quoted pricing.

Aurora Natural is also a full cotton base sheet, not alpha cellulose.  Aardenburg Imaging & Archives has tested it in the past with Epson K3 inks, and the scores were about as good as it gets for K3 lightfastness. New tests of this paper on Canon's latest Pro-11 would need to be run to confirm how it performs with Canon's Lucia Pro 11 ink set, but my guess is it will be a pretty good performer on Judy's Canon Pro-2000.  Aurora Natural is OBA-free, slightly but not significantly warm (CIELAB b* value is about 2.0).

kind regards,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com
Logged

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2018, 06:25:12 pm »

I’m a bit surprised that hairs are being split over the price of paper. Materials are the cheapest part of production, so if the price is $5 or $10/sheet for a $100, $200? or higher print, when the feel, texture and quality are there - it just doesn’t make sense.

When I show prints on Moab Entrsda Rag Natural 300g/m2 people always comment favourably on the feel, the weight, the beauty of the paper when in hand. The few % points higher cost seems worth it.
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

I.T. Supplies

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 529
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2018, 06:39:53 pm »

The Altec price sounds like a temporary discount for Moab Entrada as both B&H and Moab website sell it for $240.00 a 44" roll. Though that is about $80.00 less than Photorag.

Our pricing isn't a temporary discount unless it's stated as a discount or "promo" deal or our email blasts mentions this.  Our prices on most paper are our discounted upfront compared to retail (or even some competitors).

We have a good relationship with Legion (Moab, Museo and now Canson) as well as Hahnemuhle.
It just really depends on what you're looking for (spec wise) and we are more than happy to help find the correct paper.  If we can't get the pricing for you on the product and you get elsewhere, than so be it.  Not every company will have the best price every time unfortunately.  It also depends if the manufacturer allows a better price (MAP restrictions) vs what is stated online or via phone/email.

The Entrada is a little yellower than Photorag 308 from the new samples I have here,  and obviously warmer than Photorag UltraSmooth.
-This also depends on which version of the Entrada you're comparing the Photo Rag to.  They have both Bright and Natural available in 190, 290 and 300 gsm.

I'm really interested in product not changing at all overtime. Hahnemühle has been the most consistent I've ever used, but the damn rolls are too short. They should be 50 feet long  not 40 for that price.
This also depends on the weight of the paper.  Some that are beyond a certain gsm can't go longer as it may not feed through the roll holder on the printer.  If it has plenty of room, it's based on the manufacturer requirements which most of us don't really understand itself.

Atlex.com
Logged

deanwork

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2400
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2018, 07:30:08 pm »

Well that is a good price for Entrada Natural if it is your standard price. I only buy 44" rolls of everything so yea price matters, especially when it is $100.00 a roll cheaper. Anything that is labeled  "bright white, I don't use.

The Canson rag media is 10 feet longer than Hahnemühle and though costs a little more I just have gotten used to the longer roll, especially when the end of the roll has bump lines in it. They are the same weight.  Wish they would all use foam cores like Breathing Color.


-This also depends on which version of the Entrada you're comparing the Photo Rag to.  They have both Bright and Natural available in 190, 290 and 300 gsm.
This also depends on the weight of the paper.  Some that are beyond a certain gsm can't go longer as it may not feed through the roll holder on the printer.  If it has plenty of room, it's based on the manufacturer requirements which most of us don't really understand itself.

Atlex.com
[/quote]
Logged

wayne_melia

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2018, 08:20:06 pm »

Red River Palo Duro Softgloss Rag = 310 gsm, 16.5 mil is not a flimsy paper. It may or may not fit your definition of "matt", but it is not reflective glossy.
I am a newbie in printing, so take my words with a grain of salt, but I love the results coming out of my Canon Pro 1000. I am using the profile supplied from RR web site.
Note that RR naming can be confusing, the term paloduro is used with more than one paper.
I did a bit of research on printing forums before ordering.
Logged

MHMG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1285
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2018, 08:29:00 pm »

Oh boy, lot of new insights in the last few posts.

I first became aware of the Atlex.com price for 44 inch 40 ft length Entrada Rag Natural 300gsm (yes, the premium thickest paper of all the Entrada versions and double-side coated to boot) several months ago. At first I thought it was an error because ITSupplies doesn't list it at the same price, and ITSupplies and Altlex.com are strongly affiliated. Perhaps Atlex who is posting in this thread can clarify the exact relationship between ITSupplies and Atlex.com. But that price point has held for quite some time, so I'm inclined to take Atlex at his word. It's the real deal price at least for now!

Second, Hahnemulhe actually offers very few OBA-free papers in its diverse lineup of media. HN Museum Etching, William Turner, Photo Rag Pearl, and Photo Rag Baryta are, as far as I know, the only ones out of over 20 different media supplied by Hahnemuhle that are completely OBA-free. That said, several (but not all) Hahnemuhle papers use OBAs very sparingly, i.e. only in the paper core not in the coatings, and at relatively low levels. Location in the media composite layers and concentration levels of the OBAs are both critically important factors in how well papers containing OBAs perform in Aardenburg light fade testing. So, papers like HN photo Rag which have low OBA content and only in the paper core generally perform quite well in Aardenburg testing, albeit not always quite as well as full OBA free media like HN Museum Etching, but well enough that the enduser can be confident in the long term visual appearance of the media whitepoint color. It is the slight tweaking of the media whitepoint color with OBAs in the paper core that gives Hn Photo Rag a slight edge over HN Museum Etching, Moab Entrada Natural, and RR Aurora Natural in terms of measured b* "neutral" whitepoint value, but all of these papers range from b*= 0.0 to about 2.5. Hence, while some are a little more neutral than others none appear to be "cool white" or bright white" in color. If Bright and cool white color balance is your thing, but you also want long term image permanence, then get over your OBA impregnated cool white media bias and learn to dial in a little more "coolness" into your digital image file before you print it ;)...Just sayin, it's a file prep issue not an inherent drawback when using warmer whitepoint media as long as they are not too warm.

Third, HN Photo Rag UltraSmooth just underwent a reformulated coating according to a recent post I read by Keith Cooper either here on LULA, or perhaps I saw it on DpReview. He was privy to a client bulletin from Hahnemuhle stating as such.  Anyway, that means Photo Rag Ultrasmooth should ideally be retested with various ink sets for light fastness performance, but my guess it that the new version will still have low OBA content only residing in the paper core not in the coating. It will likely perform reasonably well, and endusers of HN low OBA content media should be reasonably confident in the overall longevity of the media itself irrespective of the longevity of the inks they use. That said, note that Hahnemuhle also makes some premium priced media which crank up the OBA content, locate it in the ink receptor coating as well, and thus all bets are off with those HN products in terms of long term media whitepoint stability.

There may also be one more wildcard in the OBA content story, namely the presence of titanium dioxide (TiO2). Essentially all resin coated (RC) photo media contain a pigmented TiO2 whitening layer, bit some non RC media incorporate TiO2 as well, and in conjunction with OBAs, this chemistry produces some nasty additional yellowing that goes beyond the mere OBA burnout result. It grows additional media discoloration when the artwork is retired to dark storage conditions or exhibited on display at lower light levels that aren't able to bleach this stain formation away like many accelerated light fade testing units do (which is why this phenomenon has gone largely unnoticed and under reported in the ratings for so long in the industry).

Best advice:  look for media that have low OBA content in the paper core only or none at all if you care about preserving the whitepoint and highlight, even midtone colors, for as long as your OEM pigmented inks are capable of providing on their own merits.

cheers,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 08:50:25 pm by MHMG »
Logged

MHMG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1285
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2018, 08:48:43 pm »

Red River Palo Duro Softgloss Rag = 310 gsm, 16.5 mil is not a flimsy paper. It may or may not fit your definition of "matt", but it is not reflective glossy.
I am a newbie in printing, so take my words with a grain of salt, but I love the results coming out of my Canon Pro 1000. I am using the profile supplied from RR web site.
Note that RR naming can be confusing, the term paloduro is used with more than one paper.
I did a bit of research on printing forums before ordering.

Palo Duro SoftGloss Rag is indeed a very nice paper, and widely regarded as another "dead ringer" if not simply rebranded version of Canson Platine Fiber Rag, as is Epson Legacy Platine Fiber. Although the base sheet may be sourced form different paper mills, albeit with nearly identical thickness and fiber texture, all of these brands appear to be coated with exact same coating chemistry by Felix Schoeller in Germany.

Palo Duro SoftGloss has a "glossy/luster" coating appearance. Considered to be a plush fine art paper but not matte fine art. Higher price point than RR Aurora Natural as well. It so happens this is also one of the three media now in test at Aardenburg Imaging and printed with the Canon OEM Pro-11/12 ink set which is the ink set used in Judy's Canon Pro-2000 printer. This paper as well as Canon's own Photo Paper Pro luster RC photo media are the other two media in test using the Pro11/12 ink set along with the Moab Entrada Natural. The Canon Pro 11 ink/ RR Palo Duro SoftGloss combination may provide enough lightfastness for many endusers, but both the RRPDSG and Canon PPPL luster type papers are testing now at approximately half the light fade resistance as the matte finish Entrada Natural. Again, this situation speaks plainly to the media coating formulation sensitivity of the latest Canon OEM ink set.

kind regards,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 10:22:10 pm by MHMG »
Logged

wayne_melia

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
Re: Looking for a thick matt paper
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2018, 09:24:12 pm »

Palo Duro SoftGloss Rag is indeed a very nice paper, .....<snip>
....The Canon Pro 11 ink/ RR Palo Duro SoftGloss combination may provide enough lightfastness for many endusers, but both the RRPDSG and Canon PPPL luster type papers are testing now at approximately half the light fade resistance as the matte finish Entrada Natural. Again, this situation speaks plainly to the media coating formulation sensitivity of the latest Canon OEM ink set.

kind regards,
Mark
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com

Thanks, Mark; your contributions from your knowledge base are what make for the best of what internet forums can be.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up