Yup - saw that footnote - but how does it explain that Orange and Green inks are not evaluated in their testing? Maybe I'm a bit dense this evening, but I don't get it.
It's really old technology and ISO standards just haven't been updated and to do so requires major hoops to accomplish it. Since it stands as the "prevailing technology" from ISO and ANSI standards, it is what it is.
There is a world of difference between WIR and Aardenburg approaches to testing. For one, Aardenburg refuses to accept ANY corporate sponsorship of ANY kind, no matter what, so you can always count on his results to be totally unbiased, totally objective and specifically scientific particularly as his process of evaluation is from a much more current and stringent model. I don't want to cast dispersions or get into innuendo at all, as everyone does what they can, but may I just say, of the two (or three) research "Institutions" out there, I prefer Aardenburg, which ironically is grossly underfunded because of the insistence of not accepting corporate sponsorship. When you consider that MHMG worked at the Smithsonian over 7 years (I believe) and was part of WIR in an early stage, and now operates on his own through Aardenburg, it is remarkable what he has been able to acomplish. My information comes from long discussions regarding color science theory, etc., which I've been most fortunate to benefit from, having opportunity to talk to him about his research. And of course, we both use Z3200ps printers for our own work, and I would guess that John Dean does as well, at least a fair amount of it, and there are many others who I won't mention because I don't know for a fact.
I don't think you're "dense" at all Mark, I just think that we've all drunk a lot of corporate Kool-Aid over the years, and have been subjected to what are now becoming viewed as "wild claims" of print permanence or longevity. Today, if the paper says archival or the print is referred to as "archival" in any way, it is end of story. A little like "organic" has taken over many products in the supermarket.
IMHO, I think it is better to err on the safe side, become intimately familiar with the science, particularly that which is cutting edge and not outdated or outmoded, yet accepted as gospel, and work from there. I expect you and others may disagree with me, but that's my position, and it's also my experience. I have absolutely had it with paper/ink combinations that won't hold up to proper scrutiny in the realm of longevity and fading. And on and on, I guess.
Take care, respectfully,
Mark