Well, i initially thought it was maybe shot thru a window with snailtracks. Also, while the noise itself is certainly not objectionable, the type of noise is. The imagecontent works and conveys a mood effectively, but the artifacts are immediately visible, and the noisetype would be visible at a larger size required to understand what we're looking at.
The tower for me doesn't add anything to the juxtaposition between night and sunset other than drawing attention to where it isn't required (and apparently to not being level).
Note: i'm just trying to explicate my observations. I don't think Slobodan really requires our comments, but since it is the critiquesection, this may be a learningexperience for the rest of us mere mortals. Stating the bloody obvious that others may disagree without further elaboration isn't particularly helpful to me personally or anyone else for that matter. imo. ymmv.
Comments, of course, are welcome. Positive or negative.
While I consider myself, on occasion, a perfectionist, I also believe that capturing a sentiment takes precedence. Do I wish I stopped the car on the side of the road, got my 5Ds from the trunk, carefully leveled it (it has an in-viewfinder indicator) and took dozen of shots? Sure. Than again, stopping on the side of the road at night, and stepping out of the car, has proved to be more dangerous than shooting with an iphone from the car
By the time I would have done that, the western sky would have lost its vibrancy and the eastern one would have gotten black. Life is a trade-off, in general.
