I'd be happy if you would comment on this one. I showed it around elsewhere and the reaction was, the picture does lack a "real subject" and that there's "no comprehensible meaning". Also it was said the central tree would be better placed somewhere according to the "rule of thirds". The "usual critique" ... I'm not thinking this is a "great piece" or something, but well worth a look as some kind of a study.
Anyway, I cannot really put my finger on it, but I somewhat find the picture interesting for it's structure, different inherent movements and directions and patterns and the differentiated green-tones. Meaning? Subject? Can't really say anything about that myself. Or is this rubbish? You know it can happen you start to see something in your own pictures that just isn't there ...
Thanks!