There's no real substitute for looking at prints in direct comparison, and I've done that, so I stick with my above suggestions. Furthermore one of the main quality improvements is superior image definition because the new model is more stable, vibrates less and the print head is supposed to be an improved version. Also note that in the new model we are dealing with one larger print-head instead of two, eliminating the idea of replacing them in pairs at high cost.I agree with mearussi's idea of investing in the future. When making large spending decisions it is more important to think forward about future performance and future costs rather than historic performance and more uncertain costs given the age of the printer.
Mark, I read your extensive review and found it an excellent analyses and well presented. You expressed it impartially, and I appreciated that.
For decades I printed only on Epson units. Candidly, I went nuts with all of the issues I would have with the units. Then I bought the iPF6400 and I have had 5 years with not one "head clog" or issue of any nature. Yes, the printer vibration is dramatically more than I felt it should be and it is nice to hear that has been calmed down a bit. But the unit I have is now starting to fail, and as it is both mechanical and electronic, once that happens be ready for major expenses. Being there is NO dealer in this area, I'm screwed should a major failure occur. I just can't see putting a grand into it now to replace the two print heads and the maintenance tank. Let the controller board fail, then I'm really pissed. Or anything that would require my taking the unit out of state to find a authorized repair station.
The reviewer, Mark, and I are on the same page in logic. Order placed with my dealer and it should ship today.
At 71 years of age, I am taking the year 2018 and going to pursue breaking into the overcrowded landscape market. With that as my focus for 2018, I'm going to print out a fresh collection of my best works (in my opinion) and I might as well print them on the 2000 even if it gives just a 10% improvement in visual impact.
To date, I have standardized on the 325gm Fine Art Baryta from Hahnemuhle for the last couple of years.
I'm hoping this paper will pull out the extra from the 2000. If others folks feel, after looking at my work, there is another paper I should test out, please speak up with WHY you feel that way.
As noted above, 95%+ of my work in B&W. I like "drama" in a print (favorite photographers are Winn Bullock and Brett Weston, Cole Thompson) and for color I like to try to achieve an painterly effect as demonstrated in the current logon image at my site. I am going to focus more on color work in the future and see if I can develop a style I enjoy.
Mark, again thanks for the best review of the 2000 I was able to find on the net, and for your suggestions here. Cash has now been allocated, hope I get what I wish to find and that the 2000 unit will compensate for the cut in my budget elsewhere in order to afford it! :-)
Jack
http://www.shadowsdancing.com