I hope to hear particularly from folks that are using the Fuji GFX, but all opinions are appreciated.
Given:
98% of my work is Landscape. Thus I purchased the 23mm when I bought the GFX and I'm totally impressed with it.
Would like to do a little bit of street work but I now want to focus some of portraits!
GFX lenses currently available, sticking strictly to lenses made for the GFX:
32-64mm Zoom f/4, cost $2,400, weight 1.93#s
63mm prime f/2.8, cost $1,500, weight 14.29 oz
110mm prime f/2, cost $2800, weight 2.22 lbs
Now, from shooting decades of MFD, and MFFile before that, it was extremely rare that I would use the normal 80mm lens - was a waste of money. I did use the Hassie 100mm lens on occasions but for the few portraits that I have done in the past.
Next, from what I'm reading in reviews, the 32-64 is just as sharp as the 63mm prime, and sharpness is extremely important to me, then I might as well grab the zoom for the obvious advantages. So I've removed the 63mm from the equation.
I'm thinking that the 110mm would be the more ideal lens for portraits, but wondering if the 32-64 would be "good enough" for portraits YET give me a nice mid range for my landscape work, thus making it the better of the choices between the 32-64mm verse the 110mm.
Again, my experience with portraits is VERY limited, yet I am finding I am really interested in trying out more of it along with some street work as I wander about.
Advice from this forum is appreciated as there is no Fuji dealer in North Carolina that I can visit and test out the lenses.
Yes, I know the ideal answer is to have both, but that is not an option at this point in time.