Luminous Landscape Home
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques > Jelly
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Jelly  (Read 737 times)

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Jelly
« on: August 14, 2017, 11:06:18 am »
Jellyfish.
There is a lot of detail lost in the jpg conversion, I had to give up on posting another one.
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Jelly
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2017, 11:45:29 am »
Wow. Well done.
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Jelly
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2017, 11:54:32 am »
+1
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

farbschlurf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 636
    • fototypo
Re: Jelly
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2017, 01:11:54 pm »
Great. Abstract and depicting at the same time-
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Jelly
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2017, 02:31:37 pm »
Good stuff. I trust you avoided getting stung.

Jeremy
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Jelly
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2017, 03:52:37 pm »
Quote from: kikashi on August 14, 2017, 02:31:37 pm
Good stuff. I trust you avoided getting stung.

Jeremy

The miracles of old technology, all these are shot through an aquarium's glass  ;D

I just had to deal with the composition and proper exposure
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques > Jelly