Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Mnt. Hood  (Read 1657 times)

HSakols

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1239
    • Hugh Sakols Photography
Mnt. Hood
« on: August 07, 2017, 09:33:31 am »

My wife and I went on our annual trip up to Oregon.  We were hoping to get away from the heat and smoke in California, only to find it was just as bad up north.  We did find some relief on Mount Hood.  I especially enjoyed Pardise Park on the mountain.  All I brought was my Olympus setup and a light tripod. 
Logged

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2017, 10:36:09 am »

Of the series, I like the fourth one best. This is not a criticism of the other three, as I appreciate the landscapes and the more abstract third, it's just the greenery somehow has more "character".
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

HSakols

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1239
    • Hugh Sakols Photography
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2017, 10:46:06 am »

I know what you are saying.  Funny, when I was photographing the corn lillies, I told my wife this is so Chliche - but I couldn't resist! There is something about the quality of the light.

Thanks for the comment.

Hugh
Logged

thierrylegros396

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1947
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2017, 11:33:45 am »

Of the series, I like the fourth one best. This is not a criticism of the other three, as I appreciate the landscapes and the more abstract third, it's just the greenery somehow has more "character".

+1 Very Nice Indeed, I like the subtle colors and curves.

Thierry
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2017, 11:34:32 am »

#3 is an interesting one, I'd be tempted to try a BW version.
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #5 on: August 07, 2017, 02:58:53 pm »

I find #3 abstractly interesting, but #4 is the most appealing.

Jeremy
Logged

Dave (Isle of Skye)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2515
  • I've even written a book about it
    • SkyePhotoGuide.com
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2017, 04:40:24 pm »

I wonder what the 4th image would look like with the Nik SilverEfex infrared filter applied?

With greens like that, sometimes a really nice mono can emerge out of it as well.

Dave
Logged

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7394
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2017, 04:01:48 am »

For me:

#1 has a bit of bland light, not very interesting.

#2 has the same type of light, but the foreground flowers add interest and context.

#3 is a nice study in diagonal lights, and has good warm light.

#4 is a good close-up, typical of what John Shaw might shoot for his books:)

HSakols

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1239
    • Hugh Sakols Photography
Re: Mnt. Hood
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2017, 10:34:24 am »

Quote
#4 is a good close-up, typical of what John Shaw might shoot for his books:)

I read and enjoyed his books!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up