Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: X1D iso invariant?  (Read 2267 times)

madlantern

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
X1D iso invariant?
« on: May 30, 2017, 05:39:35 am »

I know the X1D has great dynamic range at base iso. But what about iso-invariance? Is there a penalty to unde-exposing and pushing in post? Does it apply a secondary gain, like the A7R II?
Logged

Bart_van_der_Wolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8914
Re: X1D iso invariant?
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2017, 07:24:52 am »

I know the X1D has great dynamic range at base iso. But what about iso-invariance? Is there a penalty to unde-exposing and pushing in post? Does it apply a secondary gain, like the A7R II?

According to this info, you'll lose DR at higher ISO settings until ISO 3200:
http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Hasselblad%20X1D-50c

Do note that the PDR (which is limited by a different noise floor level, and AFAIK pattern-noise) is not the same as Engineering DR, but the principle remains.

So underexposing will reduce DR, ETTR at base ISO maximizes DR.

Cheers,
Bart
Logged
== If you do what you did, you'll get what you got. ==

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11311
    • Echophoto
Re: X1D iso invariant?
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2017, 08:15:03 pm »

Hi,

It does not have dual gain conversion.

Best regards
Erik

According to this info, you'll lose DR at higher ISO settings until ISO 3200:
http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Hasselblad%20X1D-50c

Do note that the PDR (which is limited by a different noise floor level, and AFAIK pattern-noise) is not the same as Engineering DR, but the principle remains.

So underexposing will reduce DR, ETTR at base ISO maximizes DR.

Cheers,
Bart
Logged
Erik Kaffehr
 

Paul2660

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4067
    • Photos of Arkansas
Re: X1D iso invariant?
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2017, 09:09:57 pm »

A good source for ISO invariance is the test that Dpreview does.

Here is the test for the GFX which uses the same sensor.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr134_0=fujifilm_gfx50s&attr134_1=fujifilm_gfx50s&attr134_2=fujifilm_gfx50s&attr134_3=fujifilm_gfx50s&attr136_0=7&attr136_1=1&attr136_2=3&attr136_3=2&normalization=full&widget=487&x=0.039426783253638235&y=0.49279496191950456

It appears the 50MP sensor is not totally ISO invariant but closer than not.

ISO 100 pushed 6 stops is noiser than ISO 6400.  Where as ISO 200 pushed 5 stops to 6400 is very close to being the same.

Paul Caldwell


Logged
Paul Caldwell
Little Rock, Arkansas U.S.
www.photosofarkansas.com

bclaff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
    • Photons to Photos
Re: X1D iso invariant?
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2017, 10:07:32 pm »

I know the X1D has great dynamic range at base iso. But what about iso-invariance? Is there a penalty to unde-exposing and pushing in post? Does it apply a secondary gain, like the A7R II?
The X1D does not use dual conversion gain technology.
Dpreview has a good tool to visualize ISO Invariance but I prefer my Shadow Improvement chart
Most people would consider this ISO Invariant from about ISO 200 and up.
Logged
Visit me at Photons to Photos

madlantern

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
Re: X1D iso invariant?
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2017, 06:05:07 am »

The X1D does not use dual conversion gain technology.
Dpreview has a good tool to visualize ISO Invariance but I prefer my Shadow Improvement chart
Most people would consider this ISO Invariant from about ISO 200 and up.

Thanks for the reply!  :)

Pardon my ignorance but how should I read that chart and why does it suggest ISO 200 is the tipping point for iso-invariance? It looks to me the line increases until iso800 at least.
Logged

bclaff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
    • Photons to Photos
Re: X1D iso invariant?
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2017, 11:28:11 am »

Thanks for the reply!  :)

Pardon my ignorance but how should I read that chart and why does it suggest ISO 200 is the tipping point for iso-invariance? It looks to me the line increases until iso800 at least.
Most cameras rise some over the entire ISO range but here you note only about 1/3 stop improvement over that entire range.
That's probably within any slight exposure variance.
You can also go to the chart and compare that with other cameras.
Logged
Visit me at Photons to Photos
Pages: [1]   Go Up